Literature DB >> 3974271

In vivo hemodynamic comparison of porcine and pericardial valves.

D M Cosgrove, B W Lytle, C C Gill, L A Golding, R W Stewart, F D Loop, G W Williams.   

Abstract

The bovine pericardial valve and the SupraAnnular valve have been developed to improve the hemodynamic function of tissue valves. Hemodynamic performances of the standard Carpentier-Edwards porcine valve, the Carpentier-Edwards SupraAnnular valve, and the Carpentier-Edwards bovine pericardial valve were compared in the aortic position. One hundred patients undergoing aortic valve replacement were studied intraoperatively. Mean gradient across the valve decreased for standard and pericardial valves as valve size increased. At the same flow rate, the 23 mm pericardial valve had larger valve orifice areas, higher performance indices, and lower gradients than the 23 mm SupraAnnular valve. The SupraAnnular valve is hemodynamically superior to the standard Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis. The Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve, however, is less obstructive in the aortic position than either of the porcine valves.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3974271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  6 in total

1.  Twelve-year experience with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial aortic valve at a single Japanese center.

Authors:  Koichi Arinaga; Shuji Fukunaga; Hiroshi Tomoeda; Hidetsugu Hori; Tomohiro Ueda; Ryusuke Mori; Shigeaki Aoyagi
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 1.731

2.  Doppler sonographic evaluation of mechanical and bioprosthetic mitral valve prostheses during exercise with a rate corrected pressure half time.

Authors:  P Weiss; A Hoffmann; D Burckhardt
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1992-06

3.  Non-invasive assessment by Doppler ultrasound of 155 patients with bioprosthetic valves: a comparison of the Wessex porcine, low profile Ionescu-Shiley, and Hancock pericardial bioprostheses.

Authors:  I A Simpson; I J Reece; A B Houston; I Hutton; D J Wheatley; S M Cobbe
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1986-07

4.  Early-phase events with the mitroflow pericardial valve.

Authors:  L B McGrath; L Gonzalez-Lavin
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1988

Review 5.  Heart valve replacement: which valve for which patient?

Authors:  Joseph Huh; Faisal Bakaeen
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  Speckle tracking echocardiography derived 2-dimensional myocardial strain predicts left ventricular function and mass regression in aortic stenosis patients undergoing aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Adam Staron; Manish Bansal; Piyush Kalakoti; Ayumi Nakabo; Zbigniew Gasior; Piotr Pysz; Krystian Wita; Marek Jasinski; Partho P Sengupta
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 2.357

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.