Literature DB >> 16524537

Heart valve replacement: which valve for which patient?

Joseph Huh1, Faisal Bakaeen.   

Abstract

The ideal heart valve substitute would show no deterioration or thrombogenicity, offer no resistance to blood flow, and be easy to implant. However, such a valve does not exist and we must accept compromises in some of these qualities based on our patients' needs. In selection of cardiac valve prosthesis, valve-related factors such as durability, thrombogenicity, and fluid dynamics should be carefully matched to patient-related factors such as age, size, life expectancy, comorbidities, plans for pregnancy, and lifestyle. In addition, surgeon- or operation-related factors should be considered. Technical aspects of implantation, ease of reoperation, and operative mortalities may tip the risk and benefit balance in a particular direction. We review currently available heart valve prostheses and the clinical factors that are involved in selection of a heart valve substitute.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16524537     DOI: 10.1007/s11886-006-0021-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep        ISSN: 1523-3782            Impact factor:   2.931


  63 in total

1.  Long-term survival of dialysis patients in the United States with prosthetic heart valves: should ACC/AHA practice guidelines on valve selection be modified?

Authors:  Charles A Herzog; Jennie Z Ma; Allan J Collins
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Decision guidelines for prophylactic replacement of Björk-Shiley convexo-concave heart valves: impact on clinical practice.

Authors:  M J van Gorp; E W Steyerberg; Y Van der Graaf
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-04-12       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  A randomized comparison of the MCRI On-X and CarboMedics Top Hat bileaflet mechanical replacement aortic valves: early postoperative hemodynamic function and clinical events.

Authors:  J Chambers; J Roxburgh; C Blauth; J O'Riordan; F Hodson; H Rimington
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Reoperation for Freestyle stentless aortic valves.

Authors:  G M Deeb; I A Smolens; S F Bolling; M J Eppinger; F D Pagani; R L Prager
Journal:  Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2001-10

5.  Exercise hemodynamics of bovine versus porcine bioprostheses: a prospective randomized comparison of the mosaic and perimount aortic valves.

Authors:  Walter B Eichinger; Florian Botzenhardt; Alexandra Keithahn; Ralf Guenzinger; Sabine Bleiziffer; Ina Wagner; Robert Bauernschmitt; Ruediger Lange
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  A comparison of mechanical valve performance in a poorly anticoagulated community.

Authors:  M A Williams; L Crause; S Van Riet
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.620

7.  Pregnancy and mechanical heart valves replacement; dilemma of anticoagulation.

Authors:  Adil A M Al-Lawati; M Venkitraman; Taha Al-Delaime; John Valliathu
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.191

8.  Long-term durability of the Hancock II porcine bioprosthesis.

Authors:  Giulio Rizzoli; Tomaso Bottio; Gaetano Thiene; Giuseppe Toscano; Dino Casarotto
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Early in vivo hemodynamic results after aortic valve replacement with the St Jude Medical Regent mechanical heart valve in patients with pure aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Sandro Gelsomino; Giorgio Morocutti; Paolo Da Col; Gianluca Masullo; Rocco Carella; Giorgio Guzzi; Leonardo Spedicato; Ugolino Livi
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.620

10.  Twenty year comparison of a Bjork-Shiley mechanical heart valve with porcine bioprostheses.

Authors:  H Oxenham; P Bloomfield; D J Wheatley; R J Lee; J Cunningham; R J Prescott; H C Miller
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.994

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.