Literature DB >> 3972667

Breast retraction assessment: an objective evaluation of cosmetic results of patients treated conservatively for breast cancer.

R D Pezner, M P Patterson, L R Hill, N Vora, K R Desai, J O Archambeau, J A Lipsett.   

Abstract

Breast Retraction Assessment (BRA) is an objective evaluation of the amount of cosmetic retraction of the treated breast in comparison to the untreated breast in patients who receive conservative treatment for breast cancer. A clear acrylic sheet supported vertically and marked as a grid at 1 cm intervals is employed to perform the measurements. Average BRA value (+/- standard deviation) in 29 control patients without breast cancer was 1.2 cm (+/- 0.7 cm). Average BRA value in 27 patients treated conservatively for clinical Stage I or II unilateral breast cancer was 3.7 cm (+/- 2.1 cm). BRA values in breast cancer patients ranged from 0.0 to 8.5 cm. Statistical analysis revealed that tumor size, employment of adjuvant chemotherapy and use of separate radiation lymph node fields were not factors in breast retraction. Patients who received a local radiation boost to the primary tumor bed site had statistically significantly less retraction than those who did not receive a boost. Patients who had an extensive primary tumor resection had statistically significantly more retraction than those who underwent a more limited resection. In comparison to qualitative forms of cosmetic analysis, BRA is an objective test that can quantitatively evaluate factors which may be related to cosmetic retraction in patients treated conservatively for breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3972667     DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(85)90190-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  31 in total

1.  Clinical outcomes of video-assisted skin-sparing partial mastectomy for breast cancer and immediate reconstruction with latissimus dorsi muscle flap as breast-conserving therapy.

Authors:  Hiroo Nakajima; Ikuya Fujiwara; Naruhiko Mizuta; Koichi Sakaguchi; Mahiro Ohashi; Asako Nishiyama; Yoshimi Umeda; Miho Ichida; Junji Magae
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  A pilot study on using eye tracking to understand assessment of surgical outcomes from clinical photography.

Authors:  Min Soon Kim; Angela Burgess; Andrew J Waters; Gregory P Reece; Elisabeth K Beahm; Melissa A Crosby; Karen M Basen-Engquist; Mia K Markey
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Analysis of fat necrosis after adjuvant high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy for early stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Adam A Garsa; Daniel J Ferraro; Todd Dewees; Julie A Margenthaler; Michael Naughton; Rebecca Aft; William E Gillanders; Timothy Eberlein; Melissa A Matesa; Imran Zoberi
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  A novel quantitative measure of breast curvature based on catenary.

Authors:  Juhun Lee; Si Chen; Gregory P Reece; Melissa A Crosby; Elisabeth K Beahm; Mia K Markey
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Why should diagnostic benign breast biopsies weight less than twenty grams?

Authors:  S J Parker; M Wheaton; M G Wallis; S A Harries
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Partial breast reconstruction for an inferomedial breast carcinoma using an omental flap.

Authors:  Hisamitsu Zaha; Hiroki Sunagawa; Kouji Kawakami; Tetsuo Touyama; Toshimi Yonaha; Naoto Ohshiro
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Cosmetic analysis following breast-conserving surgery and adjuvant high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy for early-stage breast cancer: a prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Adam A Garsa; Daniel J Ferraro; Todd DeWees; Julie A Margenthaler; Michael Naughton; Rebecca Aft; William E Gillanders; Timothy Eberlein; Melissa A Matesa; Imran Zoberi
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  The psychological and cosmetic aspects of breast conserving therapy compared with radical mastectomy.

Authors:  M Noguchi; Y Saito; H Nishijima; M Koyanagi; A Nonomura; Y Mizukami; S Nakamura; T Michigishi; N Ohta; H Kitagawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Quantitative Assessment of Breast Cosmetic Outcome After Whole-Breast Irradiation.

Authors:  Jay P Reddy; Xiudong Lei; Sheng-Cheng Huang; Krista M Nicklaus; Michelle C Fingeret; Simona F Shaitelman; Kelly K Hunt; Thomas A Buchholz; Fatima Merchant; Mia K Markey; Benjamin D Smith
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Comparison of brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy boost in breast-conserving therapy: Patient-reported outcome measures and aesthetic outcome.

Authors:  I Kindts; A Laenen; M Christiaens; H Janssen; E Van Limbergen; C Weltens
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 3.621

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.