Literature DB >> 20852914

A pilot study on using eye tracking to understand assessment of surgical outcomes from clinical photography.

Min Soon Kim1, Angela Burgess, Andrew J Waters, Gregory P Reece, Elisabeth K Beahm, Melissa A Crosby, Karen M Basen-Engquist, Mia K Markey.   

Abstract

Appearance changes resulting from breast cancer treatment impact the quality of life of breast cancer survivors, but current approaches to evaluating breast characteristics are very limited. It is challenging, even for experienced plastic surgeons, to describe how different aspects of breast morphology impact overall assessment of esthetics. Moreover, it is difficult to describe what they are looking for in a manner that facilitates quantification. The goal of this study is to assess the potential of using eye-tracking technology to understand how plastic surgeons assess breast morphology by recording their gaze path while they rate physical characteristics of the breasts, e.g., symmetry, based on clinical photographs. In this study, dwell time, transition frequency, dwell sequence conditional probabilities, and dwell sequence joint probabilities were analyzed across photographic poses and three observers. Dwell-time analysis showed that all three surgeons spent the majority of their time on the anterior-posterior (AP) views. Similarly, transition frequency analysis between regions showed that there were substantially more transitions between the breast regions in the AP view, relative to the number of transitions between other views. The results of both the conditional and joint probability analyses between the breast regions showed that the highest probabilities of transitions were observed between the breast regions in the AP view (APRB, APLB) followed by the oblique views and the lateral views to complete evaluation of breast surgical outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20852914      PMCID: PMC3180533          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-010-9338-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  19 in total

1.  Guidelines for standard photography in plastic surgery.

Authors:  R Yavuzer; S Smirnes; I T Jackson
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.539

2.  Clinical applications of three-dimensional photography in breast surgery.

Authors:  Greg M Galdino; Maurice Nahabedian; Michael Chiaramonte; Jason Z Geng; Stanley Klatsky; Paul Manson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  The perception of breast cancer: what differentiates missed from reported cancers in mammography?

Authors:  Claudia Mello-Thoms; Stanley Dunn; Calvin F Nodine; Harold L Kundel; Susan P Weinstein
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Anthropomorphic breast measurement: protocol and results in 50 women with aesthetically perfect breasts and clinical application.

Authors:  M Westreich
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Visual scanning patterns of radiologists searching mammograms.

Authors:  E A Krupinski
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Surgical treatment of congenital breast asymmetry.

Authors:  D J Smith; W E Palin; V Katch; J E Bennett
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 1.539

7.  Validating three-dimensional imaging of the breast.

Authors:  Albert Losken; Hisham Seify; Donald D Denson; Alfredo A Paredes; Grant W Carlson
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.539

Review 8.  Computational modelling of visual attention.

Authors:  L Itti; C Koch
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 34.870

9.  Validation of the methods of cosmetic assessment after breast-conserving therapy in the EORTC "boost versus no boost" trial. EORTC Radiotherapy and Breast Cancer Cooperative Groups. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer.

Authors:  C Vrieling; L Collette; E Bartelink; J H Borger; S J Brenninkmeyer; J C Horiot; M Pierart; P M Poortmans; H Struikmans; E Van der Schueren; J A Van Dongen; E Van Limbergen; H Bartelink
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1999-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Breast retraction assessment: an objective evaluation of cosmetic results of patients treated conservatively for breast cancer.

Authors:  R D Pezner; M P Patterson; L R Hill; N Vora; K R Desai; J O Archambeau; J A Lipsett
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Emerging applications of eye-tracking technology in dermatology.

Authors:  Kevin K John; Jakob D Jensen; Andy J King; Manusheela Pokharel; Douglas Grossman
Journal:  J Dermatol Sci       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 4.563

2.  Computational modeling of human reasoning processes for interpretable visual knowledge: a case study with radiographers.

Authors:  Yu Li; Hongfei Cao; Carla M Allen; Xin Wang; Sanda Erdelez; Chi-Ren Shyu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.