Literature DB >> 11320919

Why should diagnostic benign breast biopsies weight less than twenty grams?

S J Parker1, M Wheaton, M G Wallis, S A Harries.   

Abstract

To reduce the cosmetic deformity resulting from diagnostic biopsies, current breast screening guidelines recommend that 80% of biopsy specimens that subsequently prove to be benign should weigh less than 20 g. The relationship between specimen weight and cosmesis is unknown and evidence to support a 20 g upper limit is lacking. Patient satisfaction following all benign biopsies weighing more than 20 g (n = 49) and a random sample of 30 of those weighing less than 20 g (n = 103) performed by one screening unit, over a 6 year period, was assessed by a postal questionnaire. Overall, 32% of patients were unhappy with the cosmetic outcome of their surgery. Patient dissatisfaction appeared to increase with specimen weight (6/23 [26%] < 20 g versus 13/36 [36%] > 20 g) but no statistically significant relationship between weight and cosmesis was apparent (P = 0.57). Reducing benign breast biopsy specimen weights to a minimum is a desirable objective. However, the current quality standard is not evidence-based, is too stringent and should be revised. Strategies need to be introduced to improve patient satisfaction following breast wire-localisation biopsies. In particular, patients should be counselled pre-operatively regarding possible adverse cosmetic outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11320919      PMCID: PMC2503347     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  11 in total

1.  Cosmetic results after wire-guided biopsy of benign breast lesions.

Authors:  A O Saarela; H O Kiviniemi; T J Rissanen; K Haukipuro; O Kaarela
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Late cosmetic outcome after conservative surgery and radiotherapy: analysis of causes of cosmetic failure.

Authors:  I A Olivotto; M A Rose; R T Osteen; S Love; B Cady; B Silver; A Recht; J R Harris
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  The patient's appraisal of the cosmetic result of segmental mastectomy in benign and malignant breast disease.

Authors:  L Holmberg; E Zarén; H O Adami; R Bergström; T Burns
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Cosmetic evaluation of breast conserving treatment for mammary cancer. 2. A quantitative analysis of the influence of radiation dose, fractionation schedules and surgical treatment techniques on cosmetic results.

Authors:  E Van Limbergen; A Rijnders; E van der Schueren; T Lerut; R Christiaens
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 6.280

5.  Cosmetic evaluation of breast conserving treatment for mammary cancer. 1. Proposal of a quantitative scoring system.

Authors:  E Van Limbergen; E van der Schueren; K Van Tongelen
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  Conservative management of operable breast cancer: ten years experience at the Foundation Curie.

Authors:  R Calle; J P Pilleron; P Schlienger; J R Vilcoq
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Breast retraction assessment: an objective evaluation of cosmetic results of patients treated conservatively for breast cancer.

Authors:  R D Pezner; M P Patterson; L R Hill; N Vora; K R Desai; J O Archambeau; J A Lipsett
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Breast deformity, its correction, and assessment of breast conserving surgery.

Authors:  M Noguchi; Y Saito; Y Mizukami; A Nonomura; N Ohta; N Koyasaki; T Taniya; I Miyazaki
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Limited usefulness of observer-based cosmesis scales employed to evaluate patients treated conservatively for breast cancer.

Authors:  R D Pezner; J A Lipsett; N L Vora; K R Desai
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Biopsy and definitive radiation therapy in Stage I and II adenocarcinoma of the female breast: analysis of cosmesis and the role of electron beam supplementation.

Authors:  G R Ray; V J Fish
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.