Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Comparison of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, hemagglutination inhibition, and passive latex agglutination for determination of rubella immune status.

Literature DB >> 3968201

Comparison of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, hemagglutination inhibition, and passive latex agglutination for determination of rubella immune status.

R S Steece, M S Talley, M R Skeels, G A Lanier.

Abstract

Hemagglutination inhibition, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and passive latex agglutination were used to test 495 human serum samples for determination of rubella immunity. Overall agreements for immune status were as follows: hemagglutination inhibition versus ELISA, 94.7% (469 of 495); hemagglutination inhibition versus passive latex agglutination (1:10 dilution), 99.2% (491 of 495); and passive latex agglutination (1:10 dilution) versus ELISA, 94.7% (469 of 495). Both ELISA and passive latex agglutination are satisfactory for rubella immunity screening, with the reservation that the ELISA method examined yielded a large number of false-negative results.

Entities: Disease Species

Mesh：

Substances：
Antibodies, Viral

Year: 1985 PMID： 3968201 PMCID： PMC271594 DOI： 10.1128/jcm.21.1.140-142.1985

Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Microbiol ISSN： 0095-1137 Impact factor: 5.948

6 in total

1. Problems in determining immune status in borderline specimens in an enzyme immunoassay for rubella immunoglobulin G antibody.

Authors: R S Steece; M S Talley; M R Skeels; G A Lanier
Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 1984-06 Impact factor: 5.948

2. Comparison of hemagglutination inhibition test and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for determining antibody to rubella virus.

Authors: I C Shekarchi; J L Sever; N Tzan; A Ley; L C Ward; D Madden
Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 1981-05 Impact factor: 5.948

3. Comparison of the latex agglutination test with the hemagglutination inhibition test, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and neutralization test for detection of antibodies to rubella virus.

Authors: J M Meegan; B K Evans; D M Horstmann
Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 1982-10 Impact factor: 5.948

4. Rubella antibodies detected by several commercial immunoassays in hemagglutination inhibition-negative sera.

Authors: K T Kleeman; D J Kiefer; S P Halbert
Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 1983-11 Impact factor: 5.948

5. Use of enzyme immunoassays and the latex agglutination test to measure the temporal appearance of immunoglobulin G and M antibodies after natural infection or immunization with rubella virus.

Authors: J M Meegan; B K Evans; D M Horstmann
Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 1983-09 Impact factor: 5.948

6. Evaluation of assays for the detection of antibodies to rubella. A report based on data from the College of American Pathologists Surveys of 1982.

Authors: L P Skendzel; K R Wilcox; D C Edson
Journal: Am J Clin Pathol Date: 1983-10 Impact factor: 2.493

6 in total

7 in total

1. Evaluation of eight anti-rubella virus immunoglobulin g immunoassays that report results in international units per milliliter.

Authors: Wayne Dimech; Lena Panagiotopoulos; Barbara Francis; Nicholas Laven; Joan Marler; David Dickeson; Tony Panayotou; Kim Wilson; Robyn Wootten; Elizabeth M Dax
Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2008-04-23 Impact factor: 5.948

Comparison of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, hemagglutination inhibition, and passive latex agglutination for determination of rubella immune status.

1. Problems in determining immune status in borderline specimens in an enzyme immunoassay for rubella immunoglobulin G antibody.

2. Comparison of hemagglutination inhibition test and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for determining antibody to rubella virus.

3. Comparison of the latex agglutination test with the hemagglutination inhibition test, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and neutralization test for detection of antibodies to rubella virus.

4. Rubella antibodies detected by several commercial immunoassays in hemagglutination inhibition-negative sera.

5. Use of enzyme immunoassays and the latex agglutination test to measure the temporal appearance of immunoglobulin G and M antibodies after natural infection or immunization with rubella virus.

6. Evaluation of assays for the detection of antibodies to rubella. A report based on data from the College of American Pathologists Surveys of 1982.

1. Evaluation of eight anti-rubella virus immunoglobulin g immunoassays that report results in international units per milliliter.

2. Evaluation of a new latex test and a new enzyme immunoassay for determination of rubella immunity.

3. Presumptive identification of Salmonella enterica using two rapid tests.

4. Differences in antibody responses with rapid agglutination tests for the detection of rubella antibodies.

5. Evaluation of a latex agglutination test for screening antibodies to rubella virus.

6. High-throughput assay optimization and statistical interpolation of rubella-specific neutralizing antibody titers.

7. Comparison of five methods for the determination of rubella immunity.