Literature DB >> 6353907

Evaluation of assays for the detection of antibodies to rubella. A report based on data from the College of American Pathologists Surveys of 1982.

L P Skendzel, K R Wilcox, D C Edson.   

Abstract

Data from laboratories participating in the College of American Pathologists Surveys in 1982 provided information on the trends in testing for antibodies to rubella. Methods used by participants included: passive hemagglutination, 29%; latex agglutination card assay test, 25%; hemagglutination inhibition, 19%; enzyme immunosorbent assays, 13%; indirect fluorescent antibody assays, 11%; and radioimmunoassay, 3%. The results from these methods generally agreed well with the standard HI test, particularly for detection of immunity in negative and strongly positive samples. Laboratories should use caution, however, that the tests they use give satisfactory results with low titered sera. Compared to laboratories using the one to three-day-old chick cells with Heparin-MnCl2 for HI, laboratories using Human O Cells tended to get higher titers, and laboratories using Fixed Chick cell or Kaolin methods tended to get lower titers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6353907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  9 in total

1.  Multicenter evaluation of five commercial rubella virus immunoglobulin G kits which report in international units per milliliter.

Authors:  W Dimech; A Bettoli; D Eckert; B Francis; J Hamblin; T Kerr; C Ryan; I Skurrie
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Evaluation of a new latex test and a new enzyme immunoassay for determination of rubella immunity.

Authors:  A E Simor; R Chua; D E Low
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Differences in antibody responses with rapid agglutination tests for the detection of rubella antibodies.

Authors:  M A Chernesky; D J DeLong; J B Mahony; S Castriciano
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Latex agglutination test for rubella antibodies: report based on data from the College of American Pathologists surveys, 1983 to 1985.

Authors:  L P Skendzel; D C Edson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Comparison of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, hemagglutination inhibition, and passive latex agglutination for determination of rubella immune status.

Authors:  R S Steece; M S Talley; M R Skeels; G A Lanier
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Seroprevalence of rubella among women of childbearing age in Switzerland.

Authors:  J Zufferey; P Jacquier; S Chappuis; O Spinnler; P Hohlfeld; P L Zuber; J Bille
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Determination of immune status in patients with low antibody titers for rubella virus.

Authors:  S L Fayram; S Akin; S L Aarnaes; E M Peterson; L M de la Maza
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  United Kingdom scheme for external quality assessment in virology. Part I. General method of operation.

Authors:  S E Reed; P S Gardner; J J Snell; O Chai
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Evaluation of microparticle enzyme immunoassays for immunoglobulins G and M to rubella virus and Toxoplasma gondii on the Abbott IMx automated analyzer.

Authors:  L E Schaefer; J W Dyke; F D Meglio; P R Murray; W Crafts; A C Niles
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 5.948

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.