Literature DB >> 14711157

Faster and more sensitive VEP recording in children.

Alison M Mackay1, Ruth Hamilton, Michael S Bradnam.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In the difficult-to-test paediatric population, shorter test procedures are desirable. This study investigates whether Laplacian analysis of a three occipital-electrode montage detects steady-state VEPs (ssVEPs) more often or faster in children than a conventional montage, and if so, in which age groups.
METHODS: Steady-state VEPs (7.78 reversals/s; checkerboard stimulus) to various checksizes (60-3', 0.07-14 cpd equivalent) were recorded from 80 normal children aged from 1 month to 13 years and 19 adults. Active occipital electrodes were placed at Oz and symmetrically either side at 15% of the subject's half-head circumference (right occipital and left occipital, RO and LO). The Laplacian analysis used 2Oz-(RO+LO) instead of the conventional Oz-Fz. Fourier analysis and a circular T2 statistic was used to determine VEP detection time (DT). The number of responses detected overall by each analysis method and the effects of age and checksize on DT differences between analysis methods were investigated.
RESULTS: The Laplacian analysis detected more VEPs than the conventional Oz-Fz (95 versus 84%, p = 0.001) in children's age groups. The Laplacian analysis also provided faster response detection to 3' checks in all subjects over the age of five, and to 6' and 9' in 7-9-year-olds.
CONCLUSION: A Laplacian analysis offers increased sensitivity and faster VEP detection over conventional (Oz-Fz) recording in children over five for threshold-sized VEPs. Simultaneous use of both conventional (Oz-Fz) VEP recording and a Laplacian analysis in all patient ages is likely to give faster, more accurate VEP assessments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14711157     DOI: 10.1023/b:doop.0000005334.70304.c7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  20 in total

1.  A new statistic for steady-state evoked potentials.

Authors:  J D Victor; J Mast
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-05

2.  Spatial structure of the human alpha rhythm: global correlation in adults and local correlation in children.

Authors:  R Srinivasan
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Standard for visual evoked potentials 1995. The International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision.

Authors:  G F Harding; J V Odom; W Spileers; H Spekreijse
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Source derivation of the visual evoked response to pattern reversal stimulation.

Authors:  R A Clement; J G Flanagan; G F Harding
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-01

5.  The asymmetrical visual evoked potential to pattern reversal in one half field and its significance for the analysis of visual field defects.

Authors:  L D Blumhardt; G Barrett; A M Halliday
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Source derivation of the visually evoked potential.

Authors:  J G Flanagan; G F Harding
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-01-31       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Spatial frequency sweep VEP: visual acuity during the first year of life.

Authors:  A M Norcia; C W Tyler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Synaptogenesis in human visual cortex--evidence for synapse elimination during normal development.

Authors:  P R Huttenlocher; C de Courten; L J Garey; H Van der Loos
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1982-12-13       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  Development of grating acuity and contrast sensitivity in the central and peripheral visual field of the human infant.

Authors:  D Allen; C W Tyler; A M Norcia
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  The laplacian analysis of the pattern onset response in man.

Authors:  V Manahilov; F C Riemslag; H Spekreijse
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-03
View more
  6 in total

1.  Monocular and binocular steady-state flicker VEPs: frequency-response functions to sinusoidal and square-wave luminance modulation.

Authors:  David S Nicol; Ruth Hamilton; Uma Shahani; Daphne L McCulloch
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  A comparison of the performance of three visual evoked potential-based methods to estimate visual acuity.

Authors:  Anne Kurtenbach; Hana Langrová; Andre Messias; Eberhart Zrenner; Herbert Jägle
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-11-11       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Sensitivity and specificity of the step VEP in suspected functional visual acuity loss.

Authors:  Ruth Hamilton; Michael S Bradnam; Gordon N Dutton; Anna L Lai Chooi Yan; Tim E Lavy; I Livingstone; Alison M Mackay; Jane R Mackinnon
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 4.  VEP estimation of visual acuity: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ruth Hamilton; Michael Bach; Sven P Heinrich; Michael B Hoffmann; J Vernon Odom; Daphne L McCulloch; Dorothy A Thompson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  VEP-based acuity assessment in low vision.

Authors:  Michael B Hoffmann; Jan Brands; Wolfgang Behrens-Baumann; Michael Bach
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Threshold determination in sweep VEP and the effects of criterion.

Authors:  Naveen Kr Yadav; Fahad Almoqbel; Liseann Head; Elizabeth L Irving; Susan J Leat
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 2.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.