Literature DB >> 2078987

Results with multichannel topographical bipolar recordings of the visual evoked potential in normals and amblyopes.

V Schippers1, J Silny, G Rau, C Teping.   

Abstract

The method currently used to record topographical voltage distributions of visual evoked potentials is that of monopolar recording with respect to some arbitrary reference electrode. As an alternative we investigated the method of bipolar topographical recording of the checkerboard reversal evoked potential in four amblyopic patients and ten normal persons. The recordings were performed with a system of 14 bipolar channels, arranged in a rectangular grid with an interelectrode distance of 15% of the inion-nasion distance and centered 3 cm above the inion. The gradient distributions of the visual evoked potential obtained from normal persons showed at the time of component P2 a maximum about 3 cm above the inion. The healthy eyes of the amblyopic patients showed similar distributions and latencies. The amblyopic eyes showed normal or reduced amplitudes and normal or increased latencies with large checks and low amplitudes with smaller checks. The topographical distributions recorded with the bipolar recording system showed shifts of the maxima with the larger patterns in three of four amblyopic eyes. A technical comparison showed that these shifts can be recorded by the bipolar recording method with higher accuracy than with the monopolar method, promising a better understanding and more accurate diagnosis of amblyopia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2078987     DOI: 10.1007/BF00140502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  21 in total

1.  Modifications of the pattern-evoked potential (PEP) in relation to the stimulated part of the visual field (clues for the most probable origin of each component).

Authors:  N Lesevre; J P Joseph
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1979-08

2.  Selective suppression of cerebral evoked potentials to patterned light in amblyopia ex anopsia.

Authors:  C T Lombroso; F H Duffy; R M Robb
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1969-09

3.  Source derivation of the visually evoked potential.

Authors:  J G Flanagan; G F Harding
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-01-31       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Pattern ERG in amblyopia.

Authors:  G B Arden; S L Wooding
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields.

Authors:  D Lehmann; W Skrandies
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1980-06

6.  Spatio-temporal visually evoked scalp potentials in response to partial-field patterned stimulation.

Authors:  T M Darcey; J P Ary; D H Fender
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1980-12

7.  Source derivation: application to topographic mapping of visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  G W Thickbroom; F L Mastaglia; W M Carroll; H D Davies
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1984-07

8.  Scalp potential fields evoked by grating stimuli: effects of spatial frequency and orientation.

Authors:  W Skrandies
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1984-10

9.  Estimation of the position of the center of the fovea relative to fixation in normal subjects and in patients with amblyopia. Use of the visually evoked potential.

Authors:  R Srebro
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1982-12

Review 10.  Visually evoked potentials: theory, techniques and clinical applications.

Authors:  S Sokol
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  1976 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.048

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.