Literature DB >> 3941418

Factors used by program directors to select residents.

N E Wagoner, J R Suriano, J A Stoner.   

Abstract

A national, stratified random sample of 405 graduate medical education program directors was surveyed on the way they selected their residents. The results from the 237 respondents reaffirm earlier studies which found that the interview was the most important selection variable. The results indicate that the recent increase in competition for residency positions has increased the importance of academic variables. For example, 86 percent of the respondents stated that they would not rank a candidate who had not passed the National Board of Medical Examiners Part I examination. Because 86 percent also stated that they give preference in ranking students to those who have done well in an elective at their hospitals, the senior year of medical school may be used as a "residency chase" rather than for the general professional education of the physician.

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3941418     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-198601000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Educ        ISSN: 0022-2577


  24 in total

1.  The Canadian Urology Fair: a model for minimizing the financial and academic costs of the residency selection process.

Authors:  Ethan D Grober; Edward D Matsumoto; Michael A S Jewett; Joseph L Chin
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  A modified honours grading system and the selection of postgraduate trainees.

Authors:  J M Turnbull
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1991-05-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Use of the Interview in Resident Candidate Selection: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Alyssa Stephenson-Famy; Brenda S Houmard; Sidharth Oberoi; Anton Manyak; Seine Chiang; Sara Kim
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2015-12

4.  Medical Student Advising: Informed Individualized Advice Is the Key.

Authors:  Eva Aagaard
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2015-09

5.  Do students' and authors' genders affect evaluations? A linguistic analysis of Medical Student Performance Evaluations.

Authors:  Carol Isaac; Jocelyn Chertoff; Barbara Lee; Molly Carnes
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  Prolonged delays for research training in medical school are associated with poorer subsequent clinical knowledge.

Authors:  Liselotte N Dyrbye; Matthew R Thomas; Neena Natt; Charles H Rohren
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 7.  Radiology resident selection: Objective Restructured Interview to assess five essential attributes.

Authors:  Neela Lamki; Alfred B Watson; Richard G Fisher
Journal:  J Sci Res Med Sci       Date:  2003-08

8.  Performance in the Duke-Elder ophthalmology undergraduate prize examination and future careers in ophthalmology.

Authors:  L Joshi; V A Shanmuganathan; R L Kneebone; W Amoaku
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  Comparative reliability of structured versus unstructured interviews in the admission process of a residency program.

Authors:  Danielle Blouin; Andrew G Day; Andrey Pavlov
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2011-12

10.  The Utility of Letters of Recommendation in Predicting Resident Success: Can the ACGME Competencies Help?

Authors:  Hindi E Stohl; Nancy A Hueppchen; Jessica L Bienstock
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2011-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.