Literature DB >> 2018963

A modified honours grading system and the selection of postgraduate trainees.

J M Turnbull1.   

Abstract

The selection of medical graduates for postgraduate training has often been considered to be unreliable and arbitrary because of the quality of information made available by medical schools to program directors. Many faculties of medicine have changed from reporting graduate performance in percentage grades to using an honours/pass/fail grading system to ensure that clearly established criteria for competence have been met and to encourage excellence and minimize competition. Unfortunately, the honours/pass/fail grading system has not been able to give a clear statement of relative class standing to assist in postgraduate selection. This paper describes a modified honours grading system, which takes into account a student's grade, the relative weighting of a course and the number of honours grades awarded per course. The proposed system was found to rank students in a way similar to that of the traditional percentage grading system, with no significant loss in internal consistency. The modified honours grading system permits faculties that use honours/pass/fail grades to report student performance and class standing, thereby assisting program directors in the selection of medical students for postgraduate training.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2018963      PMCID: PMC1335319     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  19 in total

1.  Choosing interns: an exercise in frustration.

Authors:  A Newman
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1988-10-01       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  National survey of writers of dean's letters for residency applications.

Authors:  L I Leiden; G D Miller
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1986-12

3.  Factors used by program directors to select residents.

Authors:  N E Wagoner; J R Suriano; J A Stoner
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1986-01

4.  Selection methods and entry criteria for graduate medical education in neurological surgery.

Authors:  R B King
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  1985-04

5.  The applicant interview as a predictor of resident performance.

Authors:  E Komives; S T Weiss; R M Rosa
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1984-05

6.  The quality of deans' letters from medical schools.

Authors:  J Yager; G D Strauss; K Tardiff
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1984-06

7.  Resident selection: applicant selection criteria compared with performance.

Authors:  E E Erlandson; J G Calhoun; F M Barrack; A L Hull; L C Youmans; W K Davis; R H Bartlett
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Impact of medical school class ranking systems on applicants' ratings for residency positions.

Authors:  L T Gutman; S Grufferman
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1985-09

9.  Can success in the surgical residency be predicted from preresidency evaluation?

Authors:  I L Kron; D L Kaiser; S P Nolan; L E Rudolf; W H Muller; R S Jones
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Undergraduate medical education.

Authors:  A E Crowley; S I Etzel; E S Petersen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987-08-28       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  1 in total

1.  So few medical schools, so many clerk rating systems!

Authors:  P J McLeod
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-06-15       Impact factor: 8.262

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.