Literature DB >> 24019732

Radiology resident selection: Objective Restructured Interview to assess five essential attributes.

Neela Lamki1, Alfred B Watson, Richard G Fisher.   

Abstract

Like in other medical fields, candidates seeking a career in Radiology requires special skills and aptitudes. Selecting candidates for radiology residency is made difficult by the fact that many of the essential qualities predictive of a good radiology consultant, such as interpersonal skills, recognition of limits, curiosity, conscientiousness, and confidence level, are "non-cognitive", and thus difficult to assess. This paper describes the selection procedure developed by the Department of Radiology of Baylor College of Medicine to measure, as objectively as possible, both the cognitive and non-cognitive qualities of candidates, based on a combination of traditional screening and Objective Structured Interviews. This paper highlights efficacy of this selection procedure that includes both cognitive and non-cognitive factors, that is relevant also to other medical specialities.

Keywords:  Objective Structured Interview; cognitive; non-cognitive; radiology; residency

Year:  2003        PMID: 24019732      PMCID: PMC3174729     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sci Res Med Sci        ISSN: 1029-4066


  15 in total

1.  Are NBME examination scores useful in selecting radiology residency candidates?

Authors:  R B Gunderman; V P Jackson
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Critical performance behaviors of radiology residents: evaluation of two category systems.

Authors:  W L Smith; P S Wood; E M Altmaier; C O'Halloran; E A Franken
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Current practices in admission interviews at U.S. medical schools.

Authors:  E K Johnson; J C Edwards
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  A prospective study of cognitive and noncognitive selection criteria as predictors of resident performance.

Authors:  P S Wood; W L Smith; E M Altmaier; V S Tarico; E A Franken
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 6.016

5.  Improving resident selection. Discrimination by perceptual abilities.

Authors:  W L Smith; K S Berbaum
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 6.016

6.  Criteria for selection of future physicians.

Authors:  R M Sade; M R Stroud; J H Levine; G A Fleming
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Selection of anesthesiology residents.

Authors:  J D Baker; M K Bailey; N H Brahen; J M Conroy; B H Dorman; G R Haynes
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 6.893

8.  The applicant interview as a predictor of resident performance.

Authors:  E Komives; S T Weiss; R M Rosa
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1984-05

9.  Psychologic testing as an aid to selection of residents in anesthesiology.

Authors:  J S McDonald; R P Lingam; B Gupta; J Jacoby; H G Gough; P Bradley
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.108

10.  Development of an objective rating system for residency applications.

Authors:  J R Clarke; R S Wigton
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 3.982

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.