Literature DB >> 3929316

Drug discrimination procedures: roles of relative stimulus control in two-drug cases.

M D Swedberg, T U Järbe.   

Abstract

Two groups of five pigeons each were trained to discriminate morphine 5.6 mg/kg vs cocaine 5.6 mg/kg (High dose cocaine group), and morphine 5.6 mg/kg vs cocaine 3.0 mg/kg (Low dose cocaine group), respectively. Within both groups, cocaine dose generalization gradients were radically flatter in comparison to those obtained when the same cocaine dosages were discriminated from saline, whereas morphine gradients, analogously compared, were only moderately so. Responding to non-drug tests did not deviate significantly from random in either group. After lowering morphine training doses to 3.0 mg/kg in a systematic replication of the experiment, training drugs generalization gradients took symmetrical, flattened, shapes in the High dose cocaine group, whereas in the Low dose cocaine group the previous relation between gradients was enhanced. Responding to non-drug tests in this phase did not deviate significantly from random in the High dose cocaine group, whereas the reverse was true with the Low dose cocaine group. Tests with novel drugs (apomorphine, LSD, pentobarbital and delta 9-THC), did not differentiate between the groups. The roles of generalization gradients, non-drug tests and novel drugs tests as measures of relative stimulus control of training stimuli in drug discrimination experiments are discussed within the framework of a drug discrimination model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3929316     DOI: 10.1007/bf00427906

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  21 in total

1.  Effects of lisuride and LSD on cerebral monoamine systems and hallucinosis.

Authors:  L Pieri; H H Keller; W Burkard; M Da Prada
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1978-03-16       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Differential stimulus attributes of chlordiazepoxide and pentobarbital.

Authors:  H Barry; E C Krimmer
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 5.250

3.  Discriminative stimulus properties of d-amphetamine-pentobarbital combinations.

Authors:  J M Witkin; R B Carter; L A Dykstra
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  The role of fentanyl training dose and of the alternative stimulus condition in drug generalization.

Authors:  W Koek; J L Slangen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Factors regulating drug cue sensitivity: limits of discriminability and the role of a progressively decreasing training dose in fentanyl-saline discrimination.

Authors:  F C Colpaert; C J Niemegeers; P A Janssen
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 4.030

6.  Discriminative effects of morphine in the pigeon.

Authors:  T U Järbe
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 3.533

7.  Analyzing mechanism(s) of hallucinogenic drug action with drug discrimination procedures.

Authors:  J B Appel; F J White; A M Holohean
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Dopaminergic and serotonergic mediation of the discriminable effects of ergot alkaloids.

Authors:  A M Holohean; F J White; J B Appel
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  1982-07-30       Impact factor: 4.432

9.  Discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine. Effects of apomorphine, haloperidol, procaine and other drugs.

Authors:  T U Järbe
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 5.250

10.  Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) and lisuride: differentiation of their neuropharmacological actions.

Authors:  F J White; J B Appel
Journal:  Science       Date:  1982-04-30       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  7 in total

1.  The effect of training dose on discrimination of compound drug-exteroceptive stimuli.

Authors:  P M Duncan
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Drug discrimination procedures: differential characteristics of the drug A vs drug B and the drug A vs drug B vs no drug cases.

Authors:  M D Swedberg; T U Järbe
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Trends in drug discrimination research analysed with a cross-indexed bibliography, 1984-1987.

Authors:  I P Stolerman; F Rasul; P J Shine
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Increased drug sensitivity in the drug discrimination procedure afforded by drug versus drug training.

Authors:  J W Boja; M D Schechter
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Differentiation between the stimulus effects of (+)-lysergic acid diethylamide and lisuride using a three-choice, drug discrimination procedure.

Authors:  P M Callahan; J B Appel
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 6.  Modulation of the endocannabinoid system: therapeutic potential against cocaine dependence.

Authors:  Gianluigi Tanda
Journal:  Pharmacol Res       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 7.658

7.  The chlordiazepoxide/pentylenetetrazol discrimination: characterization of drug interactions and homeostatic responses to drug challenges.

Authors:  R C Michaelis; A M Holohean; J R Criado; R D Harland; G A Hunter; F A Holloway
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.530

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.