Literature DB >> 6805025

The role of fentanyl training dose and of the alternative stimulus condition in drug generalization.

W Koek, J L Slangen.   

Abstract

Different groups of rats were trained to discriminate fentanyl (F) (0.03, 0.02, or 0.01 mg/kg) from saline or to discriminate 0.03 mg/kg fentanyl (F) from alternative stimulus conditions (saline, 0.15 mg/kg nicotine, or 0.01 mg/kg F). When percentage of responses on the drug lever and percentage of time spent responding on the drug lever were used as dependent variables, it was found that training dose and alternative stimulus condition both affected the ED50 and the slope of the F generalization gradient. ED50 and slope values based on group data were not significantly different from values based on individual data. Differences between from values based on individual data. Differences between the results of the first and second 2.5-min period of the extinction test were not significant. ED50 and slope values were unaffected by the preceding training session, except in the group trained to discriminate 0.03 from 0.01 mg/kg F. A lever selection measure showed a significant effect of alternative stimulus condition on ED50 values only. Training dose and alternative stimulus condition also affected the generalization to morphine. Under none of the conditions explored in this study did generalization occur to amphetamine or nicotine. The results are discussed in terms of the relative nature of drug generalization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6805025     DOI: 10.1007/BF00435269

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  13 in total

1.  Behaviorally induced sensitivity to the discriminable properties of LSD.

Authors:  I Greenberg; D M Kuhn; J B Appel
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1975-09-17

2.  Morphine training dose: a determinant of stimulus generalization to narcotic antagonists in the rat.

Authors:  H E Shannon; S G Holtzman
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1979-03-28       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  A simplified method of evaluating dose-effect experiments.

Authors:  J T LITCHFIELD; F WILCOXON
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1949-06       Impact factor: 4.030

4.  Theoretical and methodological considerations on drug discrimination learning.

Authors:  F C Colpaert; C J Niemegeers; P A Janssen
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1976-03-16

Review 5.  Experimental methods for the study of state-dependent learning.

Authors:  D A Overton
Journal:  Fed Proc       Date:  1974-07

6.  A description of the nicotine stimulus and tests of its generalization to amphetamine.

Authors:  W T Chance; D Murfin; G M Krynock; J A Rosecrans
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1977-11-24       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Factors regulating drug cue sensitivity: limits of discriminability and the role of a progressively decreasing training dose in fentanyl-saline discrimination.

Authors:  F C Colpaert; C J Niemegeers; P A Janssen
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 4.030

8.  Factors regulating drug cue sensitivity: the effect of training dose in fentanyl-saline discrimination.

Authors:  F C Colpaert; C J Niemegeers; P A Janssen
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 5.250

9.  Morphine as a discriminative cue in gerbils: drug generalization and antagonism.

Authors:  T U Järbe; C Rollenhagen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1978-07-19       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Role of training conditions in discrimination of central nervous system stimulants by rats.

Authors:  I P Stolerman; G D D'Mello
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Neuropharmacology of the interoceptive stimulus properties of nicotine.

Authors:  Thomas E Wooters; Rick A Bevins; Michael T Bardo
Journal:  Curr Drug Abuse Rev       Date:  2009-09

2.  A comparison of testing procedures on the discriminative morphine stimulus.

Authors:  G L Kaempf; M J Kallman
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Effects of training dose on discrimination and cross-generalization of chlordiazepoxide, pentobarbital and ethanol in the rat.

Authors:  J De Vry; J L Slangen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Drug discrimination procedures: roles of relative stimulus control in two-drug cases.

Authors:  M D Swedberg; T U Järbe
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 5.  Trends in drug discrimination research analysed with a cross-indexed bibliography, 1982-1983.

Authors:  I P Stolerman; P J Shine
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Effects of drug-induced differences in reinforcement frequency on discriminative stimulus properties of fentanyl.

Authors:  J De Vry; W Koek; J L Slangen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  External stimulus control in a "drug-discrimination" procedure: drug effects and inter-animal variation.

Authors:  W Koek; J L Slangen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Discrimination of an amphetamine-pentobarbitone mixture by rats in an AND-OR paradigm.

Authors:  I P Stolerman; E A Mariathasan
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 9.  Role of training dose in drug discrimination: a review.

Authors:  Ian P Stolerman; Emma Childs; Matthew M Ford; Kathleen A Grant
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.293

10.  Nicotine and methamphetamine share discriminative stimulus effects.

Authors:  Michael B Gatch; Elva Flores; Michael J Forster
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 4.492

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.