Literature DB >> 3101110

The effect of training dose on discrimination of compound drug-exteroceptive stimuli.

P M Duncan.   

Abstract

Rats were trained to discriminate between two compound stimulus arrays that included exteroceptive (ES) and interoceptive (IS) stimulus components. The ES components were illumination and tactile cues, and the IS components were produced by d-amphetamine (A) or Na pentobarbital (P) treatment (drug versus drug discrimination). The relative ES-IS strength was then determined by testing with "mismatched" stimulus arrays consisting of combinations of ES and IS components that had not been presented simultaneously during training. Additional tests were done with ES only (no drug treatments). At training doses of 0.8 mg/kg A versus 10 mg/kg P, the ES were less salient than, but did share stimulus control with, the stronger IS components. In a second group, trained with lower doses (0.5 mg/kg A versus 4 mg/kg P), the ES were much more salient than the IS, although again, both types of stimuli did acquire some control. This dose-related sharing of stimulus control between ES and IS components is similar to relationships among components of compound arrays consisting entirely of ES, and thus further illustrates similarity between drug-produced and exteroceptive stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3101110     DOI: 10.1007/bf00174076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  8 in total

1.  Disruption of dissociated learning in a discrimination paradigm by emotionally-important stimuli.

Authors:  J F Connelly; J M Connelly; J O Epps
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1973-06-19

2.  Visual cues and shock sensitivity in the control of T-maze choice by drug conditions.

Authors:  D A Overton
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1968-08

3.  Drug discrimination procedures: roles of relative stimulus control in two-drug cases.

Authors:  M D Swedberg; T U Järbe
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Interaction between drug discriminative stimuli and exteroceptive, sensory signals.

Authors:  T U Järbe; B Johansson
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 1.912

5.  Discriminative stimulus properties of d-amphetamine-pentobarbital combinations.

Authors:  J M Witkin; R B Carter; L A Dykstra
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Interaction between discrimination of drug states and external stimuli.

Authors:  P M Duncan; J Phillips; J Reints; M D Schechter
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1979-03-14       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Influence of exteroceptive contextual conditions upon internal drug stimulus control.

Authors:  T U Järbe; T Laaksonen; R Svensson
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Rapid acquisition of a two-drug discrimination: time of day effect upon saline state.

Authors:  M D Schechter
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 3.533

  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  Trends in drug discrimination research analysed with a cross-indexed bibliography, 1984-1987.

Authors:  I P Stolerman; F Rasul; P J Shine
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Nicotine competes with a visual stimulus for control of conditioned responding.

Authors:  Jennifer E Murray; Nicole R Wells; Rick A Bevins
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.280

3.  Excitatory conditioning to the interoceptive nicotine stimulus blocks subsequent conditioning to an exteroceptive light stimulus.

Authors:  Jennifer E Murray; Rick A Bevins
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Effect of drug-paired exteroceptive stimulus presentations on methamphetamine reinstatement in rats.

Authors:  Keith L Shelton; Patrick M Beardsley
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 3.533

5.  Inhaled toluene vapor as a discriminative stimulus.

Authors:  Keith L Shelton
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.293

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.