Literature DB >> 3097722

Drug discrimination procedures: differential characteristics of the drug A vs drug B and the drug A vs drug B vs no drug cases.

M D Swedberg, T U Järbe.   

Abstract

Two groups of pigeons with a history of two choice operant drug discrimination tasks (3.0 mg/kg morphine versus 5.6 mg/kg cocaine, and 3.0 mg/kg morphine versus 3.0 mg/kg cocaine, respectively; Swedberg and Järbe 1985) were subjected to three choice tasks in which responses on a third manipulandum were reinforced in the no drug condition. Training drugs generalization gradients in both groups were similar to those normally obtained in two choice drug versus no drug tasks. The salience differences between the training stimuli within the groups observed in the previous two choice task did not differentially affect the three choice discrimination gradients. Tests with novel drugs after the introduction of the no drug condition yielded increased responding to the no drug condition with the exception of the dopamine agonist apomorphine. Results are discussed in terms of a discrimination learning model specifying principles of relative discriminative stimulus control in various discrimination cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3097722     DOI: 10.1007/bf00179188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  11 in total

1.  Effects of chlormethiazole (Heminevrin) on drug discrimination and open-field behavior in gerbils.

Authors:  M D Swedberg; P Loman; T U Järbe
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1978-10-31       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  A simplified method of evaluating dose-effect experiments.

Authors:  J T LITCHFIELD; F WILCOXON
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1949-06       Impact factor: 4.030

3.  Effects of lisuride and LSD on cerebral monoamine systems and hallucinosis.

Authors:  L Pieri; H H Keller; W Burkard; M Da Prada
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1978-03-16       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Comparison among four vehicles and four routes for administering delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol.

Authors:  R D Sofia; R K Kubena; H Barry
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1974-06       Impact factor: 3.534

5.  Drug discrimination procedures: roles of relative stimulus control in two-drug cases.

Authors:  M D Swedberg; T U Järbe
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Further characterization of the three-choice morphine, cyclazocine and saline discrimination paradigm: opioids with agonist and antagonist properties.

Authors:  J M White; S G Holtzman
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 4.030

7.  Opiate agonist-antagonist interactions: application of a three-key drug discrimination procedure.

Authors:  C P France; J H Woods
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 4.030

8.  Three-choice drug discrimination in the rat: morphine, cyclazocine and saline.

Authors:  J M White; S G Holtzman
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 4.030

9.  Drug discrimination and generalization in pigeons.

Authors:  M R Leberer; S C Fowler
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 3.533

10.  Three-choice drug discrimination: phencyclidine-like stimulus effects of opioids.

Authors:  J M White; S G Holtzman
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  3 in total

1.  Trends in drug discrimination research analysed with a cross-indexed bibliography, 1984-1987.

Authors:  I P Stolerman; F Rasul; P J Shine
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Differentiation between the stimulus effects of (+)-lysergic acid diethylamide and lisuride using a three-choice, drug discrimination procedure.

Authors:  P M Callahan; J B Appel
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  On the Similarity Between the Reinforcing and the Discriminative Properties of Intracranial Self-Stimulation.

Authors:  David N Velazquez-Martinez; Benita Lizeth Pacheco-Gomez; Ana Laura Toscano-Zapien; Maria Almudena Lopez-Guzman; Daniel Velazquez-Lopez
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 3.558

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.