Literature DB >> 3925472

Gender differences in the perception of pungency.

J E Cometto-Muñiz, G Noriega.   

Abstract

Males and females judged the intensity of the typical pungent stimulus CO2, presented by nose and by mouth, employing two scaling procedures: magnitude estimation and magnitude matching. The two groups differed in their perception of CO2 pungency only when it was judged in the nose. Perceived nasal pungency grew as a power function of CO2 concentration, with an exponent of 2.2 for females and 1.6 for males, and the magnitude matching test showed that, relative to their perception of sucrose sweetness, females perceived pungency more intense throughout the range studied. Perceived buccal pungency grew for both groups as the 1.1 power of CO2 concentration, and the magnitude matching test, employing again sweetness as the reference modality, revealed no intensity differences in the perception of buccal pungency between the genders. It is suggested that the susceptibility of the nasal environment to hormonal and neural influences may account for the differences in perceived pungency between males and females.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3925472     DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(85)90200-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  11 in total

1.  Odorous and pungent attributes of mixed and unmixed odorants.

Authors:  J E Cometto-Muñiz; S M Hernández
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-04

2.  Exposure study to examine chemosensory effects of formaldehyde on hyposensitive and hypersensitive males.

Authors:  Joerg U Mueller; Thomas Bruckner; Gerhard Triebig
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Intranasal localizability of odorants: influence of stimulus volume.

Authors:  J Frasnelli; T Hummel; J Berg; G Huang; R L Doty
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  Neurobiological and psychophysical mechanisms underlying the oral sensation produced by carbonated water.

Authors:  C T Simons; J M Dessirier; M I Carstens; M O'Mahony; E Carstens
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Differences in nasal irritant sensitivity by age, gender, and allergic rhinitis status.

Authors:  Dennis Shusterman; Mary Alice Murphy; John Balmes
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2003-08-12       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 6.  Sick-building syndrome fatigue as a possible predation defense.

Authors:  A C Chester
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  1995 Jan-Mar

Review 7.  Chemogenic Subqualities of Mouthfeel.

Authors:  Christopher T Simons; Amanda H Klein; Earl Carstens
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 3.160

8.  Olfactory and trigeminal interaction of menthol and nicotine in humans.

Authors:  Bertold Renner; Karen Schreiber
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The influence of sex, allergic rhinitis, and test system on nasal sensitivity to airborne irritants: a pilot study.

Authors:  D Shusterman; M A Murphy; J Balmes
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Odor and chemesthesis from exposures to glutaraldehyde vapor.

Authors:  William S Cain; Roland Schmidt; Alfredo A Jalowayski
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 2.851

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.