Literature DB >> 11171519

The influence of sex, allergic rhinitis, and test system on nasal sensitivity to airborne irritants: a pilot study.

D Shusterman1, M A Murphy, J Balmes.   

Abstract

"Nasal irritant sensitivity" is an important construct in environmental health science; functional measures, however, lack standardization. We performed duplicate measures of nasal irritant perceptual acuity on 16 subjects (evenly divided by sex and seasonal allergy status) using two different test compounds: carbon dioxide (CO2) (detection) and n-propanol (localization). The a priori hypotheses included a) allergic rhinitics will display lower perceptual thresholds than nonrhinitics; b) females will display lower perceptual thresholds than males; and c) estimates of perceptual acuity using the two test systems will be positively correlated. We obtained CO2 detection thresholds using an ascending concentration series, presenting 3-sec pulses of CO2, paired with air in random order, by nasal cannula. We obtained localization thresholds by simultaneously presenting stimuli (ascending concentrations of n-propanol vapor in air) and blanks (saturated water vapor in air) to opposite nostrils, with laterality randomized. In terms of test-retest reliability, individual replicate measures for CO2 detection thresholds correlated more closely than did the localization thresholds of volatile organic compounds (VOC) (r = 0.65 and r = 0.60, respectively). As an intertest comparison, log-transformed individual mean CO2 and VOC measures were positively correlated with an r of 0.63 (p < 0.01). In univariate analyses, sex predicted both log-transformed CO2 and VOC thresholds (females being more "sensitive"; p < 0.05 and 0.001, respectively). Nasal allergies predicted sensory testing results only in the multivariate analysis, and then only for VOC localization (p < 0.05). The question of population variation in nasal irritant sensitivity (as well as the generalizability of results across test compounds) deserves further attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11171519      PMCID: PMC1242045          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.0110915

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  18 in total

1.  Variation in sensitivity to environmental tobacco smoke among adult non-smokers.

Authors:  K M Cummings; A Zaki; S Markello
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 2.  Dysfunctional buildings or dysfunctional people: an examination of the sick building syndrome and allied disorders.

Authors:  C M Ryan; L A Morrow
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1992-04

3.  Consistent pattern of elevated symptoms in air-conditioned office buildings: a reanalysis of epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  M J Mendell; A H Smith
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Trigeminal and olfactory sensitivity: comparison of modalities and methods of measurement.

Authors:  J E Cometto-Muñiz; W S Cain
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  Aeroallergens and work-related respiratory symptoms among office workers.

Authors:  D Menzies; P Comtois; J Pasztor; F Nunes; J A Hanley
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 10.793

6.  Measurement of nasal irritant sensitivity to pulsed carbon dioxide: a pilot study.

Authors:  D Shusterman; J Balmes
Journal:  Arch Environ Health       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct

7.  Efficacy of volatile organic compounds in evoking nasal pungency and odor.

Authors:  J E Cometto-Muñiz; W S Cain
Journal:  Arch Environ Health       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct

Review 8.  Building-related illnesses.

Authors:  D Menzies; J Bourbeau
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-11-20       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Textile wall materials and sick building syndrome.

Authors:  J J Jaakkola; P Tuomaala; O Seppänen
Journal:  Arch Environ Health       Date:  1994 May-Jun

Review 10.  The sick building syndrome. I. Definition and epidemiological considerations.

Authors:  C C Chang; R A Ruhl; G M Halpern; M E Gershwin
Journal:  J Asthma       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.515

View more
  3 in total

1.  Exposure study on chemosensory effects of epsilon-caprolactam in the low concentration range.

Authors:  A E Ziegler; H Zimmer; G Triebig
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2007-10-09       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Differences in nasal irritant sensitivity by age, gender, and allergic rhinitis status.

Authors:  Dennis Shusterman; Mary Alice Murphy; John Balmes
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2003-08-12       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 3.  Toxicology of nasal irritants.

Authors:  Dennis Shusterman
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.919

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.