Literature DB >> 12920525

Differences in nasal irritant sensitivity by age, gender, and allergic rhinitis status.

Dennis Shusterman1, Mary Alice Murphy, John Balmes.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Sensory (eye, nose, and throat) irritation is an important component of non-specific building-related illness ("sick-building syndrome"). Inter-individual variability in susceptibility to upper airway/mucous membrane irritants is suspected epidemiologically, but has been neglected experimentally. We wished to document population variability in nasal irritant sensitivity, as indexed by threshold measurements of sensory acuity. We hypothesized that younger subjects, women, and allergic rhinitis sufferers would display lower sensory thresholds than would older subjects, men, and rhinitis non-sufferers.
METHODS: We evaluated Sixty human subjects (stratified by age, gender, and seasonal allergy status), using two different test systems: (1) carbon dioxide (detection) and (2) n-propanol (localization). We obtained carbon dioxide (CO2) detection thresholds using an ascending concentration series, presenting 3-s pulses of CO2, paired with air in random order, by nasal cannula. Localization thresholds were obtained by the simultaneous presentation of n-propanol vapor (ascending concentrations in air) and blanks (saturated water vapor in air) to opposite nostrils, with laterality randomized. Threshold data were log-transformed to satisfy normality and analyzed by population marker via ANOVA and linear regression.
RESULTS: Test-retest variability was greater for volatile organic compound (VOC) localization than for CO2 detection (r=0.50 and 0.75, respectively); the two measurements were, however, positively correlated (r=0.48; P<0.001). Age predicted both (log-transformed) VOC localization thresholds (P<0.0001) and (log-transformed) CO2 thresholds (P<0.01), with younger age predicting lower thresholds. Female gender predicted lower CO2 detection (P<0.05) but not VOC localization thresholds (P=0.10). Nasal allergies predicted lower VOC localization (P<0.05) but not CO2 detection thresholds (P=0.52).
CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with epidemiological reporting patterns in so-called problem buildings, nasal irritant sensitivity appears to be non-randomly distributed in the population, with significant variability predicted by age, gender, and the presence of allergic rhinitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12920525     DOI: 10.1007/s00420-003-0459-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health        ISSN: 0340-0131            Impact factor:   3.015


  29 in total

Review 1.  Psychophysical and behavioral characteristics of olfactory adaptation.

Authors:  P Dalton
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  Variation in sensitivity to environmental tobacco smoke among adult non-smokers.

Authors:  K M Cummings; A Zaki; S Markello
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 7.196

3.  Aeroallergens and work-related respiratory symptoms among office workers.

Authors:  D Menzies; P Comtois; J Pasztor; F Nunes; J A Hanley
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 10.793

4.  Measurement of nasal irritant sensitivity to pulsed carbon dioxide: a pilot study.

Authors:  D Shusterman; J Balmes
Journal:  Arch Environ Health       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct

Review 5.  Sensory irritation. Relation to indoor air pollution.

Authors:  J E Cometto-Muñiz; W S Cain
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1992-04-30       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Prevalence of olfactory impairment in older adults.

Authors:  Claire Murphy; Carla R Schubert; Karen J Cruickshanks; Barbara E K Klein; Ronald Klein; David M Nondahl
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-11-13       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Neural integration and allergic disease.

Authors:  B J Undem; R Kajekar; D D Hunter; A C Myers
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 10.793

8.  Histamine enhances vagal pulmonary C-fiber responses to capsaicin and lung inflation.

Authors:  L Y Lee; R F Morton
Journal:  Respir Physiol       Date:  1993-07

9.  Acoustic rhinometric assessment of the nasal valve.

Authors:  R Roithmann; J Chapnik; N Zamel; S M Barreto; P Cole
Journal:  Am J Rhinol       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct

10.  Acute sensory responses of nonsmokers at very low environmental tobacco smoke concentrations in controlled laboratory settings.

Authors:  M H Junker; B Danuser; C Monn; T Koller
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  15 in total

1.  From chemosensory thresholds to whole body exposures-experimental approaches evaluating chemosensory effects of chemicals.

Authors:  Christoph van Thriel; Michael Schäper; Ernst Kiesswetter; Stefan Kleinbeck; Stephanie Juran; Meinolf Blaszkewicz; Hajo-Hennig Fricke; Lilo Altmann; Hans Berresheim; Thomas Brüning
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2006-01-06       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 2.  Occupational irritant and allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  Dennis Shusterman
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.806

3.  Computational fluid dynamics and trigeminal sensory examinations of empty nose syndrome patients.

Authors:  Chengyu Li; Alexander A Farag; James Leach; Bhakthi Deshpande; Adam Jacobowitz; Kanghyun Kim; Bradley A Otto; Kai Zhao
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 4.  Local effects in the respiratory tract: relevance of subjectively measured irritation for setting occupational exposure limits.

Authors:  Josje H E Arts; Cees de Heer; Ruud A Woutersen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2005-11-08       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  Intranasal trigeminal sensitivity in subjects with allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  H Doerfler; T Hummel; L Klimek; G Kobal
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2005-06-23       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 6.  Setting occupational exposure limits in humans: contributions from the field of experimental psychology.

Authors:  Monique A M Smeets; Jan H A Kroeze; Pamela H Dalton
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 3.015

7.  Chemosensory loss: functional consequences of the world trade center disaster.

Authors:  Pamela H Dalton; Richard E Opiekun; Michele Gould; Ryan McDermott; Tamika Wilson; Christopher Maute; Mehmet H Ozdener; Kai Zhao; Edward Emmett; Peter S J Lees; Robin Herbert; Jacqueline Moline
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Regional peak mucosal cooling predicts the perception of nasal patency.

Authors:  Kai Zhao; Jianbo Jiang; Kara Blacker; Brian Lyman; Pamela Dalton; Beverly J Cowart; Edmund A Pribitkin
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Evaluation of trigeminal sensitivity to ammonia in asthmatics and healthy human volunteers.

Authors:  Maja Petrova; Jeanmarie Diamond; Benno Schuster; Pamela Dalton
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.724

10.  Odor and chemesthesis from exposures to glutaraldehyde vapor.

Authors:  William S Cain; Roland Schmidt; Alfredo A Jalowayski
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 2.851

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.