Literature DB >> 3916078

The output of pulse-echo ultrasound equipment: a survey of powers, pressures and intensities.

F A Duck, H C Starritt, J D Aindow, M A Perkins, A J Hawkins.   

Abstract

A survey of the powers, pressures and intensities generated by ultrasonic pulse-echo equipment in clinical use has been carried out. Three conventional B-scanners, four linear-array scanners and four mechanically sectored scanners were included in the study. Measurements were made on a total of 22 transducers covering the nominal frequency range 2.25-7.5 MHz. On those instruments where an output power control was provided, two measurements were made: one at the maximum available power and a second at a lower power. On arrays with a variable transmit focus control, measurements were made at all available focus settings. In all, measurements were made on 38 separate focused pulsed ultrasonic fields. The measurements were carried out using a calibrated ultrasonic force balance, and a calibrated polyvinylidene difluoride (PVdF) membrane hydrophone. A very wide range of maximum powers, pressures and intensities were found. Powers from 0.5-80 mW were measured; spatial-average temporal-peak positive pressures at the transducer varied between 30 kPa and 1.15 MPa, and spatial-peak pulse-average intensities were in the range 3.6 X 10(3)-1.1 X 10(7) Wm-2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3916078     DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-58-694-989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  6 in total

Review 1.  Section 8--clinical relevance. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 2.  Section 6--mechanical bioeffects in the presence of gas-carrier ultrasound contrast agents. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 3.  Section 7--discussion of the mechanical index and other exposure parameters. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 4.  Section 4--bioeffects in tissues with gas bodies. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Bacterial stress responses to 1-megahertz pulsed ultrasound in the presence of microbubbles.

Authors:  A C Vollmer; S Kwakye; M Halpern; E C Everbach
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Investigation of a pulse compression technique for medical ultrasound: a simulation study.

Authors:  N A Rao
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.602

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.