Literature DB >> 8580742

Imaging of prostate cancer.

P L Choyke1.   

Abstract

Prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment is fast emerging as a major health care issue in the United States. However, there are great uncertainties about the value of specific tests and therapies. Imaging modalities play a major role in the current management of patients with prostate cancer and this role is likely to expand in the future. Transrectal ultrasound is used to identify nonpalpable lesions, direct systematic biopsies, determine gland volume and stage prostate cancers. For staging skeletal metastases, the bone scan is acknowledged as the best method, however controversy surrounds its routine use in patients with low prostate specific antigen (PSA) values. Computed tomography (CT) and transrectal ultrasound have limited value in detecting extracapsular disease but CT can be used in conjunction with percutaneous biopsy to identify nodal metastases. The role of Endorectal coil MRI is currently evolving in the wake of a disappointing multi-institutional trial but MRI still holds the most promise for accurately detecting local extent of prostate cancer. New radiolabeled techniques with monoclonal antibodies and peptide imaging are also having early but promising results. The role of imaging in prostate cancer is continuing to evolve as technology and knowledge about prostate cancer biology improves and health care economics force a more judicious use of imaging resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8580742     DOI: 10.1007/bf01256700

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Imaging        ISSN: 0942-8925


  39 in total

1.  Ultrasonically guided transperineal seed implantation of the prostate: modification of the technique and qualitative assessment of implants.

Authors:  A van't Riet; H J te Loo; A F Ypma; A C Mak; F H van Slooten; C J Hoekstra; M C Stenfert Kroese
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 2.  Staging prostatic cancer.

Authors:  R Clements; G J Griffiths; W B Peeling
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 2.350

3.  Hypoechoic lesions of the prostate: clinical relevance of tumor size, digital rectal examination, and prostate-specific antigen.

Authors:  F Lee; S Torp-Pedersen; P J Littrup; R D McLeary; T A McHugh; A P Smid; P J Stella; G S Borlaza
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Preoperative evaluation of localized prostatic carcinoma by transrectal ultrasonography.

Authors:  J E Pontes; S Eisenkraft; H Watanabe; H Ohe; M Saitoh; G P Murphy
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Radioimmunoscintigraphy of pelvic lymph nodes with 111indium-labeled monoclonal antibody CYT-356.

Authors:  R J Babaian; J Sayer; D A Podoloff; L C Steelhammer; V A Bhadkamkar; J V Gulfo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Accuracy of imaging modalities in staging the local extent of prostate cancer.

Authors:  T Ebert; B J Schmitz-Dräger; K F Bürrig; S Miller; N Pauli; T Kahn; R Ackermann
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 2.241

7.  MR lymphography: study of a high-efficiency lymphotrophic agent.

Authors:  R Weissleder; J F Heautot; B K Schaffer; N Nossiff; M I Papisov; A Bogdanov; T J Brady
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Strontium-89--precursor targeted therapy for pain relief of blastic metastatic disease.

Authors:  R G Robinson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 9.  Clinical experience with strontium-89 in prostatic and breast cancer patients.

Authors:  R G Robinson; D F Preston; K G Baxter; R W Dusing; J A Spicer
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.929

10.  Short-term freedom from disease progression after I-125 prostate implantation.

Authors:  K Wallner; J Roy; M Zelefsky; Z Fuks; L Harrison
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1994-09-30       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Three-dimensional magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging of brain and prostate cancer.

Authors:  J Kurhanewicz; D B Vigneron; S J Nelson
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2000 Jan-Apr       Impact factor: 5.715

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.