Literature DB >> 15452703

Spinal muscle forces, internal loads and stability in standing under various postures and loads--application of kinematics-based algorithm.

A Shirazi-Adl1, M El-Rich, D G Pop, M Parnianpour.   

Abstract

This work aimed to evaluate trunk muscle forces, internal loads and stability margin under some simulated standing postures, with and without external loads, using a nonlinear finite element model of the T1-S1 spine with realistic nonlinear load-displacement properties. A novel kinematics-based algorithm was applied that exploited a set of spinal sagittal rotations, initially calculated to minimize balancing moments, to solve the redundant active-passive system. The loads consisted of upper body gravity distributed along the spine with or without 200 N held in the hands, either in the front of the body or on the sides. Nonlinear and linear stability/perturbation analyses at deformed, stressed configurations with a linear stiffness-force relationship for muscles identified the system stability and critical muscle stiffness coefficient. Predictions were in good agreement with reported measurements of posture, muscle EMG and intradiscal pressure. Minimal changes in posture (posterior pelvic tilt and lumbar flattening) substantially influenced muscle forces, internal loads and stability margin. Addition of 200 N load in front of the body markedly increased the system stability, global muscle forces, and internal loads, which reached anterior shear and compression forces of approximately 500 N and approximately 1,200 N, respectively, at lower lumbar levels. Co-activation in abdominal muscles (up to 3% maximum force) substantially increased extensor muscle forces, internal loads and stability margin, allowing a smaller critical muscle coefficient. A tradeoff existed between lower internal loads in passive tissues and higher stability margins, as both increased with greater muscle activation. The strength of the proposed model is in accounting for the synergy by simultaneous consideration of passive structure and muscle forces under applied postures and loads.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15452703      PMCID: PMC3489208          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-004-0779-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  49 in total

1.  Response of trunk muscle coactivation to changes in spinal stability.

Authors:  K P Granata; K F Orishimo
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  A universal model of the lumbar back muscles in the upright position.

Authors:  N Bogduk; J E Macintosh; M J Pearcy
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 3.  Stability of the lumbar spine. A study in mechanical engineering.

Authors:  A Bergmark
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand Suppl       Date:  1989

4.  A mathematical analysis of the force-stiffness characteristics of muscles in control of a single joint system.

Authors:  R Shadmehr; M A Arbib
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.086

5.  Effect of changes in lordosis on mechanics of the lumbar spine-lumbar curvature in lifting.

Authors:  A Shirazi-Adl; M Parnianpour
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1999-10

6.  Role of muscles in lumbar spine stability in maximum extension efforts.

Authors:  M Gardner-Morse; I A Stokes; J P Laible
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  The geometry of the psoas muscle as determined by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  J G Reid; L A Livingston; D J Pearsall
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Disc pressure measurements.

Authors:  A L Nachemson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1981 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Stability of the human spine in neutral postures.

Authors:  A Kiefer; A Shirazi-Adl; M Parnianpour
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  CT-based geometric data of human spine musculature. Part I. Japanese patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  J S Han; J Y Ahn; V K Goel; R Takeuchi; D McGowan
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1992-12
View more
  16 in total

1.  Effect of the intra-abdominal pressure and the center of segmental body mass on the lumbar spine mechanics - a computational parametric study.

Authors:  W M Park; S Wang; Y H Kim; K B Wood; J A Sim; G Li
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  [Is there a correlation between back pain and stability of the lumbar spine in pregnancy? A model-based hypothesis].

Authors:  A Liebetrau; C Puta; D Schinowski; T Wulf; H Wagner
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.107

3.  A history of spine biomechanics. Focus on 20th century progress.

Authors:  T R Oxland
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Analysis of squat and stoop dynamic liftings: muscle forces and internal spinal loads.

Authors:  Babak Bazrgari; Aboulfazl Shirazi-Adl; Navid Arjmand
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Uneven intervertebral motion sharing is related to disc degeneration and is greater in patients with chronic, non-specific low back pain: an in vivo, cross-sectional cohort comparison of intervertebral dynamics using quantitative fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Alan Breen; Alexander Breen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  The lumbar spine has an intrinsic shape specific to each individual that remains a characteristic throughout flexion and extension.

Authors:  Anastasia V Pavlova; Judith R Meakin; Kay Cooper; Rebecca J Barr; Richard M Aspden
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Trunk-Pelvis motions and spinal loads during upslope and downslope walking among persons with transfemoral amputation.

Authors:  Julian C Acasio; Iman Shojaei; Rajit Banerjee; Christopher L Dearth; Babak Bazrgari; Brad D Hendershot
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  A biomechanical model for estimating loads on thoracic and lumbar vertebrae.

Authors:  Sravisht Iyer; Blaine A Christiansen; Benjamin J Roberts; Michael J Valentine; Rajaram K Manoharan; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 2.063

9.  In vivo loads in the lumbar L3-4 disc during a weight lifting extension.

Authors:  Shaobai Wang; Won Man Park; Yoon Hyuk Kim; Thomas Cha; Kirkham Wood; Guoan Li
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 2.063

10.  Effects of the weight configuration of hand load on trunk musculature during static weight holding.

Authors:  Saman Madinei; Xiaopeng Ning
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 2.778

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.