Literature DB >> 27435734

Walking through the statistical black boxes of plant breeding.

Alencar Xavier1, William M Muir2, Bruce Craig3, Katy Martin Rainey4.   

Abstract

KEY MESSAGE: The main statistical procedures in plant breeding are based on Gaussian process and can be computed through mixed linear models. Intelligent decision making relies on our ability to extract useful information from data to help us achieve our goals more efficiently. Many plant breeders and geneticists perform statistical analyses without understanding the underlying assumptions of the methods or their strengths and pitfalls. In other words, they treat these statistical methods (software and programs) like black boxes. Black boxes represent complex pieces of machinery with contents that are not fully understood by the user. The user sees the inputs and outputs without knowing how the outputs are generated. By providing a general background on statistical methodologies, this review aims (1) to introduce basic concepts of machine learning and its applications to plant breeding; (2) to link classical selection theory to current statistical approaches; (3) to show how to solve mixed models and extend their application to pedigree-based and genomic-based prediction; and (4) to clarify how the algorithms of genome-wide association studies work, including their assumptions and limitations.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27435734     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-016-2750-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  67 in total

1.  Theoretical basis of the Beavis effect.

Authors:  Shizhong Xu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  THE NUMBER OF ALLELES THAT CAN BE MAINTAINED IN A FINITE POPULATION.

Authors:  M KIMURA; J F CROW
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1964-04       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Semi-parametric genomic-enabled prediction of genetic values using reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces methods.

Authors:  Gustavo De los Campos; Daniel Gianola; Guilherme J M Rosa; Kent A Weigel; José Crossa
Journal:  Genet Res (Camb)       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Alkes L Price; Nick J Patterson; Robert M Plenge; Michael E Weinblatt; Nancy A Shadick; David Reich
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-07-23       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  SNP imputation in association studies.

Authors:  Eran Halperin; Dietrich A Stephan
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  Hierarchical Spatial Process Models for Multiple Traits in Large Genetic Trials.

Authors:  Sudipto Banerjee; Andrew O Finley; Patrik Waldmann; Tore Ericsson
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 5.033

7.  Identification of loci governing eight agronomic traits using a GBS-GWAS approach and validation by QTL mapping in soya bean.

Authors:  Humira Sonah; Louise O'Donoughue; Elroy Cober; Istvan Rajcan; François Belzile
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 9.803

8.  Advantages and pitfalls in the application of mixed-model association methods.

Authors:  Jian Yang; Noah A Zaitlen; Michael E Goddard; Peter M Visscher; Alkes L Price
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Locally epistatic genomic relationship matrices for genomic association and prediction.

Authors:  Deniz Akdemir; Jean-Luc Jannink
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  A comparison of methods for whole-genome QTL mapping using dense markers in four livestock species.

Authors:  Andres Legarra; Pascal Croiseau; Marie Pierre Sanchez; Simon Teyssèdre; Guillaume Sallé; Sophie Allais; Sébastien Fritz; Carole Rénée Moreno; Anne Ricard; Jean-Michel Elsen
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 4.297

View more
  7 in total

1.  Overview of Genomic Prediction Methods and the Associated Assumptions on the Variance of Marker Effect, and on the Architecture of the Target Trait.

Authors:  Réka Howard; Diego Jarquin; José Crossa
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

2.  Adaptability and stability of Coffea canephora to dynamic environments using the Bayesian approach.

Authors:  Fabio Luiz Partelli; Flavia Alves da Silva; André Monzoli Covre; Gleison Oliosi; Caio Cezar Guedes Correa; Alexandre Pio Viana
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Training set determination for genomic selection.

Authors:  Jen-Hsiang Ou; Chen-Tuo Liao
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Genomic prediction using subsampling.

Authors:  Alencar Xavier; Shizhong Xu; William Muir; Katy Martin Rainey
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Estimating variance components in population scale family trees.

Authors:  Tal Shor; Iris Kalka; Dan Geiger; Yaniv Erlich; Omer Weissbrod
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 5.917

6.  Additive genetic variance and covariance between relatives in synthetic wheat crosses with variable parental ploidy levels.

Authors:  L E Puhl; J Crossa; S Munilla; P Pérez-Rodríguez; R J C Cantet
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Genome-Wide Analysis of Grain Yield Stability and Environmental Interactions in a Multiparental Soybean Population.

Authors:  Alencar Xavier; Diego Jarquin; Reka Howard; Vishnu Ramasubramanian; James E Specht; George L Graef; William D Beavis; Brian W Diers; Qijian Song; Perry B Cregan; Randall Nelson; Rouf Mian; J Grover Shannon; Leah McHale; Dechun Wang; William Schapaugh; Aaron J Lorenz; Shizhong Xu; William M Muir; Katy M Rainey
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 3.154

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.