Literature DB >> 34750534

Long-term impact of conventional and optimal contribution conservation methods on genetic diversity and genetic gain in local pig breeds.

Qingbo Zhao1,2, Huiming Liu2, Qamar Raza Qadri1, Qishan Wang3, Yuchun Pan4, Guosheng Su5.   

Abstract

There are rich and vast genetic resources of indigenous pig breeds in the world. Currently, great attention is paid to either crossbreeding or conservation of these indigenous pig breeds, and insufficient attention is paid to the combination of conservation and breeding along with their long-term effects on genetic diversity. Therefore, the objective of this study is to compare the long-term effects of using conventional conservation and optimal contribution selection methods on genetic diversity and genetic gain. A total of 11 different methods including conventional conservation and optimal contribution selection methods were investigated using stochastic simulations. The long-term effects of using these methods were evaluated in terms of genetic diversity metrices such as expected heterozygosity (He) and the rate of genetic gain. The results indicated that the rates of true inbreeding in these conventional conservation methods were maintained at around 0.01. The optimal contribution selection methods based either on the pedigree (POCS) or genome (GOCS) information showed more genetic gain than conventional methods, and POCS achieved the largest genetic gain. Furthermore, the effect of using GOCS methods on most of the genetic diversity metrics was slightly better than the conventional conservation methods when the rate of true inbreeding was the same, but this also required more sires used in OCS methods. According to the rate of true inbreeding, there was no significant difference among these conventional methods. In conclusion, there is no significant difference in different ways of selecting sows on inbreeding when we use different conventional conservation methods. Compared with conventional methods, POCS method could achieve the most genetic gain. However, GOCS methods can not only achieve higher genetic gain, but also maintain a relatively high level of genetic diversity. Therefore, GOCS is a better choice if we want to combine conservation and breeding in actual production in the conservation farms.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Genetics Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34750534      PMCID: PMC8626428          DOI: 10.1038/s41437-021-00484-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  29 in total

Review 1.  Genetic diversity in farm animals--a review.

Authors:  L F Groeneveld; J A Lenstra; H Eding; M A Toro; B Scherf; D Pilling; R Negrini; E K Finlay; H Jianlin; E Groeneveld; S Weigend
Journal:  Anim Genet       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  Prediction of response to marker-assisted and genomic selection using selection index theory.

Authors:  J C M Dekkers
Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.380

3.  There is room for selection in a small local pig breed when using optimum contribution selection: a simulation study.

Authors:  J L Gourdine; A C Sørensen; L Rydhmer
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Adaptation and possible ancient interspecies introgression in pigs identified by whole-genome sequencing.

Authors:  Huashui Ai; Xiaodong Fang; Bin Yang; Zhiyong Huang; Hao Chen; Likai Mao; Feng Zhang; Lu Zhang; Leilei Cui; Weiming He; Jie Yang; Xiaoming Yao; Lisheng Zhou; Lijuan Han; Jing Li; Silong Sun; Xianhua Xie; Boxian Lai; Ying Su; Yao Lu; Hui Yang; Tao Huang; Wenjiang Deng; Rasmus Nielsen; Jun Ren; Lusheng Huang
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 5.  The future of livestock breeding: genomic selection for efficiency, reduced emissions intensity, and adaptation.

Authors:  Ben J Hayes; Harris A Lewin; Michael E Goddard
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 11.639

6.  Enzyme variability in the Drosophila willistoni group. IV. Genic variation in natural populations of Drosophila willistoni.

Authors:  F J Ayala; J R Powell; M L Tracey; C A Mourão; S Pérez-Salas
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The genetic diversity and population structures of indigenous pig breeds in Zhejiang Province revealed by GGRS sequencing.

Authors:  J Chen; J Peng; Q Xiao; Y Pan; X Zhang; L J Lo; N Xu
Journal:  Anim Genet       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Mating strategies with genomic information reduce rates of inbreeding in animal breeding schemes without compromising genetic gain.

Authors:  H Liu; M Henryon; A C Sørensen
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Pedigree relationships to control inbreeding in optimum-contribution selection realise more genetic gain than genomic relationships.

Authors:  Mark Henryon; Huiming Liu; Peer Berg; Guosheng Su; Hanne Marie Nielsen; Gebreyohans T Gebregiwergis; A Christian Sørensen
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  A fast Newton-Raphson based iterative algorithm for large scale optimal contribution selection.

Authors:  Binyam S Dagnachew; Theo H E Meuwissen
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 4.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.