Literature DB >> 16550404

K-Train--a computer-based, interactive training program with an incorporated certification system for practicing kinetic perimetry: evaluation of acceptance and success rate.

U Schiefer1, K Nowomiejska, E Krapp, J Pätzold, C A Johnson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate, in an experimental study, an interactive, computer-based teaching procedure for kinetic perimetry that incorporates an evaluation system for scoring examination technique. METHODS AND
SUBJECTS: K-Train was developed and based on the original user interface of the new semi-automated kinetic perimetry (SKP) feature of the OCTOPUS 101 perimeter (HAAG-STREIT, Koeniz, Switzerland). The trainer creates a 3D individual "hill of vision" for a specific pathology and the trainee can individually select target characteristics and independently define origin, end and direction of each kinetic stimulus with the help of vectors. Quality of the perimetric examination can be quantitatively assessed by the ratio of intersection area and union area of the trainee's result and the related trainer-defined original isopter. This ratio and other parameters are used to define a score of "perimetric quality". The general acceptance of K-Train was assessed in 30 participants in two perimetric courses. The success rate was examined by comparing the scores before and after a perimetric training session.
RESULTS: The K-Train course was graded by the participants with an average score of 1.35 (range 1-3) in a scoring system ranging from 1=excellent to 6=unsatisfactory. The average perimetric quality score increased from 48 before to 59 (max. 100) after the training (27 trainees) indicating that K-Train was able to achieve and also verify a considerable success rate.
CONCLUSION: The acceptance of K-Train, a computer-based, interactive tool that allows for certification, education and quality control of kinetic perimetry, is high. K-Train is capable of improving a trainee's individual performance in kinetic perimetry and of verifying this by an appropriate scoring system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16550404     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-006-0291-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  11 in total

1.  [Automated kinetic perimetry using different stimulus velocities].

Authors:  B Wabbels; G Kolling
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  [Standardization of perimetry].

Authors:  S ZEHNDER-ALBRECHT
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  1950-11       Impact factor: 3.250

3.  Optimal rates of movement for kinetic perimetry.

Authors:  C A Johnson; J L Keltner
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-01

4.  Comparison of central and peripheral visual field properties in the optic neuritis treatment trial.

Authors:  J L Keltner; C A Johnson; J O Spurr; R W Beck
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  The visual field in normal subjects.

Authors:  K Egge
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Suppl       Date:  1984

6.  Static and kinetic visual field testing. Reproducibility in normal volunteers.

Authors:  R K Parrish; J Schiffman; D R Anderson
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-10

7.  [Evaluation of extensive visual field defects with computer-assisted kinetic perimetry].

Authors:  U Schiefer; J Schiller; J Paetzold; T J Dietrich; R Vonthein; D Besch
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 0.700

8.  Quantitative evaluation of manual kinetic perimetry using computer simulation.

Authors:  L R Shapiro; C A Johnson
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1990-04-01       Impact factor: 1.980

9.  Homonymous hemianopic field defects and driving in Canada.

Authors:  J L Parisi; R A Bell; H Yassein
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 1.882

10.  Passing the DVLC field regulations following bilateral pan-retinal photocoagulation in diabetics.

Authors:  M F Hulbert; S A Vernon
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.775

View more
  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of kinetic programs in various automated perimeters.

Authors:  Shigeki Hashimoto; Chota Matsumoto; Mariko Eura; Sachiko Okuyama; Yoshikazu Shimomura
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Telerehabilitation for people with low vision.

Authors:  Ava K Bittner; Patrick D Yoshinaga; Stephanie L Wykstra; Tianjing Li
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-02-27

Review 3.  [Recommendations for a standardized perimetry within the framework of epilepsy surgery].

Authors:  M T Lutz; T Mayer; U Schiefer
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  The use of semi-automated kinetic perimetry (SKP) to monitor advanced glaucomatous visual field loss.

Authors:  J Nevalainen; J Paetzold; E Krapp; R Vonthein; C A Johnson; U Schiefer
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 5.  Telerehabilitation for people with low vision.

Authors:  Ava K Bittner; Stephanie L Wykstra; Patrick D Yoshinaga; Tianjing Li
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-08-31

6.  How sensitive is pupil campimetry in hemifield loss?

Authors:  Karolína Skorkovská; Helmut Wilhelm; Holger Lüdtke; Barbara Wilhelm
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Volume of visual field assessed with kinetic perimetry and its application to static perimetry.

Authors:  John B Christoforidis
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-04-26
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.