Literature DB >> 3761412

Automated production and analysis of echo contrast agents.

M W Keller, S B Feinstein, R A Briller, S M Powsner.   

Abstract

To develop and standardize contrast agents for use in contrast echocardiographic imaging, microbubble size, concentration, decay, and ultrasound backscatter must be known. These parameters were assessed with a scanning laser particle counter, a commercial ultrasound unit, and various sonicated intravenous solutions. The scanning laser particle counter proved to be a fast and effective means of evaluating microbubble size, concentration, and stability. In addition, sonication was found to be a reliable and reproducible technique for preparing standardized echo contrast agent solutions containing uniformly small microbubbles. The bubbles generated ranged in size from 1 to 15 micron in diameter. All solutions had mean bubble diameters less than 6 micron. The half life of solutions ranged from 44 +/- 12 seconds for Hypaque 50%, to 253 +/- 73 seconds for Iopamidol. Addition of the surfactant to dextrose 70% prolonged bubble half life from 58 +/- 12 seconds to 1018 +/- 276 seconds. Phased array two-dimensional echocardiography of sonicated microbubble solutions, and subsequent videodensitometric analysis, revealed that bubble concentration was directly proportional to echo-reflective properties, and that the solutions have significant ultrasound reflective properties in vitro at concentrations of less than 1500 bubbles/ml.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3761412     DOI: 10.7863/jum.1986.5.9.493

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  10 in total

Review 1.  Section 8--clinical relevance. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 2.  Section 6--mechanical bioeffects in the presence of gas-carrier ultrasound contrast agents. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 3.  Section 7--discussion of the mechanical index and other exposure parameters. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 4.  Section 4--bioeffects in tissues with gas bodies. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Biological imaging with 4D ultrafast electron microscopy.

Authors:  David J Flannigan; Brett Barwick; Ahmed H Zewail
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The mechanism and clinical implication of improved left ventricular videointensity following intravenous injection of multi-fold dilutions of albumin with dextrose.

Authors:  T R Porter; F Xie; A Kricsfeld
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1995-06

7.  Myocardial contrast two-dimensional echocardiography.

Authors:  F J Ten Cate; N de Jong; W Mittertreiner; P W Serruys; J R Roelandt
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1989

8.  Sonicated X-ray contrast agents for quantitative myocardial contrast echocardiography--a critical approach.

Authors:  I V Mayer; M P Lazarov; U Utzinger; A U Freiburghaus; O M Hess
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.037

9.  Contrast echocardiography of the left ventricle an independent predictor of pulmonary artery pressure?

Authors:  R J Zotz; S Genth; R Erbel; H A Dieterich; J Meyer
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1994-09

10.  Air-filled proteinaceous microbubbles: synthesis of an echo-contrast agent.

Authors:  M W Grinstaff; K S Suslick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-09-01       Impact factor: 11.205

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.