Literature DB >> 3760327

Vowel errors in noise and in reverberation by hearing-impaired listeners.

A K Nábĕlek, P A Dagenais.   

Abstract

The effects of noise and reverberation on the identification of monophthongs and diphthongs were evaluated for ten subjects with moderate sensorineural hearing losses. Stimuli were 15 English vowels spoken in a /b-t/ context, in a carrier sentence. The original tape was recorded without reverberation, in a quiet condition. This test tape was degraded either by recording in a room with reverberation time of 1.2 s, or by adding a babble of 12 voices at a speech-to-noise ratio of 0 dB. Both types of degradation caused statistically significant reductions of mean identification scores as compared to the quiet condition. Although the mean identification scores for the noise and reverberant conditions were not significantly different, the patterns of errors for these two conditions were different. Errors for monophthongs in reverberation but not in noise seemed to be related to an overestimation of vowel duration, and there was a tendency to weight the formant frequencies differently in the reverberation and quiet conditions. Errors for monophthongs in noise seemed to be related to spectral proximity of formant frequencies for confused pairs. For the diphthongs in both noise and reverberation, there was a tendency to judge a diphthong as the beginning monophthong. This may have been due to temporal smearing in the reverberation condition, and to a higher masked threshold for changing compared to stationary formant frequencies in the noise condition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3760327     DOI: 10.1121/1.393948

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  7 in total

1.  Decline of speech understanding and auditory thresholds in the elderly.

Authors:  Pierre L Divenyi; Philip B Stark; Kara M Haupt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  On the minimum audible difference in direct-to-reverberant energy ratio.

Authors:  Erik Larsen; Nandini Iyer; Charissa R Lansing; Albert S Feng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The impact of reverberant self-masking and overlap-masking effects on speech intelligibility by cochlear implant listeners (L).

Authors:  Kostas Kokkinakis; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  A deep learning algorithm to increase intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in the presence of a competing talker and reverberation.

Authors:  Eric W Healy; Masood Delfarah; Eric M Johnson; DeLiang Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Tone language experience-dependent advantage in pitch representation in brainstem and auditory cortex is maintained under reverberation.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Chandan H Suresh; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Speech perception adjusts to stable spectrotemporal properties of the listening environment.

Authors:  Christian E Stilp; Paul W Anderson; Ashley A Assgari; Gregory M Ellis; Pavel Zahorik
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-09-03       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Effects of reverberation on brainstem representation of speech in musicians and non-musicians.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 3.252

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.