Literature DB >> 21895052

The impact of reverberant self-masking and overlap-masking effects on speech intelligibility by cochlear implant listeners (L).

Kostas Kokkinakis1, Philipos C Loizou.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the relative impact of reverberant self-masking and overlap-masking effects on speech intelligibility by cochlear implant listeners. Sentences were presented in two conditions wherein reverberant consonant segments were replaced with clean consonants, and in another condition wherein reverberant vowel segments were replaced with clean vowels. The underlying assumption is that self-masking effects would dominate in the first condition, whereas overlap-masking effects would dominate in the second condition. Results indicated that the degradation of speech intelligibility in reverberant conditions is caused primarily by self-masking effects that give rise to flattened formant transitions.
© 2011 Acoustical Society of America

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21895052      PMCID: PMC3188965          DOI: 10.1121/1.3614539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  7 in total

1.  Phonetic identification in quiet and in noise by listeners with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Benjamin Munson; Peggy B Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Speech enhancement with multichannel Wiener filter techniques in multimicrophone binaural hearing aids.

Authors:  Tim Van den Bogaert; Simon Doclo; Jan Wouters; Marc Moonen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of source-to-listener distance and masking on perception of cochlear implant processed speech in reverberant rooms.

Authors:  Nathaniel A Whitmal; Sarah F Poissant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Reverberant overlap- and self-masking in consonant identification.

Authors:  A K Nábĕlek; T R Letowski; F M Tucker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Vowel errors in noise and in reverberation by hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  A K Nábĕlek; P A Dagenais
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The contribution of obstruent consonants and acoustic landmarks to speech recognition in noise.

Authors:  Ning Li; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Contribution of consonant versus vowel information to sentence intelligibility for young normal-hearing and elderly hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Diane Kewley-Port; T Zachary Burkle; Jae Hee Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.840

  7 in total
  9 in total

1.  Comparing the effects of reverberation and of noise on speech recognition in simulated electric-acoustic listening.

Authors:  Kate Helms Tillery; Christopher A Brown; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Evaluation of a spectral subtraction strategy to suppress reverberant energy in cochlear implant devices.

Authors:  Kostas Kokkinakis; Christina Runge; Qudsia Tahmina; Yi Hu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Perception of consonants in reverberation and noise by adults fitted with bimodal devices.

Authors:  Michelle Mason; Kostas Kokkinakis
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Objective speech intelligibility measurement for cochlear implant users in complex listening environments.

Authors:  João F Santos; Stefano Cosentino; Oldooz Hazrati; Philipos C Loizou; Tiago H Falk
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 2.017

5.  Effects of early and late reflections on intelligibility of reverberated speech by cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Yi Hu; Kostas Kokkinakis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Use of amplitude modulation cues recovered from frequency modulation for cochlear implant users when original speech cues are severely degraded.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Hyun Joon Shim; Christian Lorenzi; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-02-15

7.  The combined effects of reverberation and noise on speech intelligibility by cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Oldooz Hazrati; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 2.117

8.  Application of a Graphical Model to Investigate the Utility of Cross-channel Information for Mitigating Reverberation in Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Lidea K Shahidi; Leslie M Collins; Boyla O Mainsah
Journal:  Proc Int Conf Mach Learn Appl       Date:  2019-01-17

9.  Formant priority channel selection for an "n-of-m" sound processing strategy for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Juliana N Saba; Hussnain Ali; John H L Hansen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.482

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.