Literature DB >> 3758684

The concept of visual field indices.

J Flammer.   

Abstract

Statistical methods for the evaluation of quantitative visual fields are presented in addition to a mathematical description of the calculation of different visual field indices. The "mean defect" is important for diffuse damage as well as for follow-up in advanced stages. "Short-term fluctuation" provides information about the reliability of the results as well as about possible early damage. "Corrected loss variance" quantifies local defects in an early stage; it also separates real local defects from increased scatter. "Skewness" is a test for very early local defects, and "spatial correlation" provides a measurement of the clustering of any local defects that may be present.

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3758684     DOI: 10.1007/bf02173350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  8 in total

1.  Static perimetry: strategies.

Authors:  H Bebie; F Fankhauser; J Spahr
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1976-07

2.  Problems related to the design of automatic perimeters.

Authors:  F Fankhauser
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1979-09-17       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Correlation between color vision scores and quantitative perimetry in suspected glaucoma.

Authors:  J Flammer; S M Drance
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-01

4.  Creation of the transformed Q statistic probability distribution to aid in the detection of abnormal computerized visual fields.

Authors:  R J Brechner; W R Whalen
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg       Date:  1984-10

5.  Differential light threshold in automated static perimetry. Factors influencing short-term fluctuation.

Authors:  J Flammer; S M Drance; F Fankhauser; L Augustiny
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-06

6.  Quantification of glaucomatous visual field defects with automated perimetry.

Authors:  J Flammer; S M Drance; L Augustiny; A Funkhouser
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Effect of acetazolamide on the differential threshold.

Authors:  J Flammer; S M Drance
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1983-09

8.  Differential light threshold. Short- and long-term fluctuation in patients with glaucoma, normal controls, and patients with suspected glaucoma.

Authors:  J Flammer; S M Drance; M Zulauf
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-05
  8 in total
  42 in total

1.  New superior-inferior visual field asymmetry indices for detecting POAG and their agreement with the glaucoma hemifield test.

Authors:  N Ghazali; T Aslam; D B Henson
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  A comparison of global indices between the Medmont Automated Perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer.

Authors:  John Landers; Alok Sharma; Ivan Goldberg; Stuart Graham
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  A comparison of unweighted and fluctuation-weighted indices (within the central 28 degrees of glaucomatous visual fields measured with the Octopus automated perimeter).

Authors:  A T Funkhouser; F Fankhauser
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  The effects of weighting the "mean defect" visual field index according to threshold variability in the central and midperipheral visual field.

Authors:  A Funkhouser; F Fankhauser
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  A comparison of five methods for estimating general glaucomatous visual field depression.

Authors:  A Funkhouser; J Flammer; F Fankhauser; H P Hirsbrunner
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Problems related to diffuse versus localized loss in the perimetry of glaucomatous visual fields.

Authors:  A T Funkhouser; F Fankhauser; R A Weale
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  How often do patients need visual field tests?

Authors:  A C Viswanathan; R A Hitchings; F W Fitzke
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  The visualFields package: a tool for analysis and visualization of visual fields.

Authors:  Iván Marín-Franch; William H Swanson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Comparison of retinal nerve-fiber layer in high- and normal-tension glaucoma.

Authors:  Y Yamazaki; C Koide; T Miyazawa; N Kuwagaki; H Yamada
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Interobserver agreement on visual field progression in glaucoma: a comparison of methods.

Authors:  A C Viswanathan; D P Crabb; A I McNaught; M C Westcott; D Kamal; D F Garway-Heath; F W Fitzke; R A Hitchings
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.638

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.