Literature DB >> 9342606

How often do patients need visual field tests?

A C Viswanathan1, R A Hitchings, F W Fitzke.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to determine whether the interval between visual field tests affects the ability to detect progressive glaucomatous field loss.
METHODS: One hundred and nineteen retinal locations which were deteriorating significantly by > or = 1 dB/ year (untreated normal tension glaucoma patients: 6 eyes) were studied. Analysis was repeated using 'thinned' visual field tests: one test per year instead of the complete three per year over a period of 4 years.
RESULTS: The 'thinned' tests identified only 45.4% of the deteriorating points over the 4-year period. Furthermore, there was a mean delay of 1.10 years in detection (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Less frequent visual field testing detects fewer progressing locations and detects them later.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9342606     DOI: 10.1007/bf00947085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  20 in total

1.  Do computerised visual fields and automated optic disc analysis assist in the choice of therapy in glaucoma?

Authors:  F S Mikelberg
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Does computerised perimetry offer practical advances in choice of therapy in the glaucoma patient?

Authors:  H Dunbar Hoskins
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Perimetric follow-up in glaucoma with a reduced set of test points.

Authors:  J Weber; M Diestelhorst
Journal:  Ger J Ophthalmol       Date:  1992

4.  The progress of the visual field in chronic simple glaucoma and ocular hypertension treated topically with pilocarpine or with timolol.

Authors:  R P Crick; R B Newson; M J Shipley; H Blackmore; C J Bulpitt
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Long-term fluctuation of the visual field in glaucoma.

Authors:  R J Boeglin; J Caprioli; M Zulauf
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1992-04-15       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  The diagnosis of visual field progression in glaucoma.

Authors:  F W Fitzke; A I McNaught
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.761

7.  Effect of patient experience on the results of automated perimetry in glaucoma suspect patients.

Authors:  E B Werner; T Krupin; A Adelson; M E Feitl
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  The concept of visual field indices.

Authors:  J Flammer
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Analysis of visual field progression in glaucoma.

Authors:  F W Fitzke; R A Hitchings; D Poinoosawmy; A I McNaught; D P Crabb
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Differential light threshold. Short- and long-term fluctuation in patients with glaucoma, normal controls, and patients with suspected glaucoma.

Authors:  J Flammer; S M Drance; M Zulauf
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-05
View more
  7 in total

1.  Frequency of testing for detecting visual field progression.

Authors:  S K Gardiner; D P Crabb
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Bayes' theorem applied to perimetric progression detection in glaucoma: from specificity to positive predictive value.

Authors:  Nomdo M Jansonius
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Towards an optimal perimetric strategy for progression detection in glaucoma: from fixed-space to adaptive inter-test intervals.

Authors:  Nomdo M Jansonius
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Progression detection in glaucoma can be made more efficient by using a variable interval between successive visual field tests.

Authors:  Nomdo M Jansonius
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-04-17       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 5.  Detection and measurement of clinically meaningful visual field progression in clinical trials for glaucoma.

Authors:  C Gustavo De Moraes; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Leonard A Levin
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 21.198

6.  Interobserver agreement on visual field progression in glaucoma: a comparison of methods.

Authors:  A C Viswanathan; D P Crabb; A I McNaught; M C Westcott; D Kamal; D F Garway-Heath; F W Fitzke; R A Hitchings
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Randomised controlled trial comparing the effect of brimonidine and timolol on visual field loss after acute primary angle closure.

Authors:  T Aung; F T S Oen; H-T Wong; Y-H Chan; B-K Khoo; Y-P Liu; C-L Ho; J See; L H Thean; A C Viswanathan; S K L Seah; P T K Chew
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.638

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.