Literature DB >> 1743870

A comparison of unweighted and fluctuation-weighted indices (within the central 28 degrees of glaucomatous visual fields measured with the Octopus automated perimeter).

A T Funkhouser1, F Fankhauser.   

Abstract

The main visual field indices of Flammer and the analogous ones of Heijl have been compared based on a population of 113 glaucomatous visual fields. It is shown that for the population studied, the differences between the two sets of indices are negligible for Octopus G1 program results and that they may thus be used interchangeably.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1743870     DOI: 10.1007/bf00128955

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0165-5701            Impact factor:   2.031


  11 in total

1.  Evaluation of visual fields by ophthalmologists and by OCTOSMART program.

Authors:  H Kaufmann; J Flammer; C Rutishauser
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.250

2.  A clinical study of perimetric probability maps.

Authors:  A Heijl; P Asman
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-02

3.  Evaluating human and automated interpretation of visual field data in perimetry.

Authors:  H P Hirsbrunner; F Fankhauser; A T Funkhouser; A Jenni
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Evaluating a perimetric expert system: experience with Octosmart.

Authors:  H P Hirsbrunner; F Fankhauser; A Jenni; A Funkhouser
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Computer-assisted evaluation of visual fields.

Authors:  H Bebie
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  The concept of visual field indices.

Authors:  J Flammer
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Normal variability of static perimetric threshold values across the central visual field.

Authors:  A Heijl; G Lindgren; J Olsson
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-11

8.  Visual field interpretation with empiric probability maps.

Authors:  A Heijl; G Lindgren; J Olsson; P Asman
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-02

9.  A comparison of the mean defect and mean deviation indices within the central 28 degrees of the glaucomatous visual field.

Authors:  A T Funkhouser; F Fankhauser
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.447

10.  Quantification of glaucomatous visual field defects with automated perimetry.

Authors:  J Flammer; S M Drance; L Augustiny; A Funkhouser
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  3 in total

1.  A comparison of five methods for estimating general glaucomatous visual field depression.

Authors:  A Funkhouser; J Flammer; F Fankhauser; H P Hirsbrunner
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Normal visual fields measured with Octopus-Program G1. II. Global visual field indices.

Authors:  M Zulauf; R P LeBlanc; J Flammer
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 3.  The discovery of the Flammer syndrome: a historical and personal perspective.

Authors:  Josef Flammer; Katarzyna Konieczka
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 6.543

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.