Literature DB >> 3755148

Reacquisition of contrastive stress in an adventitiously deaf speaker using a single-channel cochlear implant.

S B Leder, J B Spitzer, P Milner, C Flevaris-Phillips, F Richardson, J C Kirchner.   

Abstract

Acoustic correlates of contrastive stress, i.e., fundamental frequency (F0), duration, and intensity, and listener perceptions of stress, were investigated in a profoundly deaf subject (RS) pre/post single-channel cochlear implant and longitudinally, and compared to the overall patterns of age-peer profoundly deaf (JM) and normally hearing subjects (DL). The stimuli were a group of general American English words in which a change of function from noun to verb is associated with a shift of stress from initial to final syllable, e.g., CON'trast versus conTRAST'. Precochlear implant, RS was unable to produce contrastive stress correctly. Hearing one day post-stimulation resulted in significantly higher F0 for initial and final stressed versus unstressed syllables. Four months post-stimulation, RS maintained significantly higher F0 on stressed syllables, as well as generalization of significantly increased intensity and longer syllable duration differences for all stressed versus unstressed syllables. Perceptually, listeners judged RS's contrastive stress placement as incorrect precochlear implant and as always correct post-cochlear implant. JM's contrastive stress was judged as 96% correct, and DL's contrastive stress placement was 100% correct. It was concluded that RS reacquired all acoustic correlates needed for appropriate differentiation of contrastive stress with longitudinal use of the cochlear implant.

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3755148     DOI: 10.1121/1.393204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  5 in total

1.  [Experiments on prosody perception with cochlear implants].

Authors:  H Meister; D Tepeli; P Wagner; W Hess; M Walger; H von Wedel; R Lang-Roth
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  [Conception and realisation of a prosody test battery].

Authors:  H Meister; V Pyschny; M Landwehr; P Wagner; M Walger; H von Wedel
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Immediate effects of cochlear implantation on voice quality.

Authors:  S B Leder; J B Spitzer; J C Kirchner
Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1987

4.  Evaluation of decisions regarding candidates for cochlear implants.

Authors:  J B Spitzer
Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1988

5.  Assessing Ecologically Valid Methods of Auditory Feedback Measurement in Individuals With Typical Speech.

Authors:  Nicole E Tomassi; Hasini R Weerathunge; Megan R Cushman; Jason W Bohland; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 2.674

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.