Literature DB >> 3662930

Immediate effects of cochlear implantation on voice quality.

S B Leder1, J B Spitzer, J C Kirchner.   

Abstract

Seminal quantitative group acoustic data are presented on voice quality changes following electrical stimulation (ES) of the auditory nerve via a single-channel cochlear implant (CI). It was found that the fundamental frequency (Fo) of our patients was significantly lower after the first day of ES, while intensity and speaking duration were not significantly different from pre-CI values. These results suggest that the CI provides enough frequency information less than 300 Hz to permit immediate and independent alterations in voice Fo towards normal-hearing speakers values. Our findings also indicate that intensity and speaking duration require additional time before differences found become significant. Longitudinal data are still needed to determine if Fo continues to lower and if intensity and/or speaking duration change significantly to approximate values observed in normal-hearing individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3662930     DOI: 10.1007/bf00458555

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0302-9530


  13 in total

1.  Cochlear implants.

Authors:  W F House
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1976 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.547

2.  Reacquisition of contrastive stress in an adventitiously deaf speaker using a single-channel cochlear implant.

Authors:  S B Leder; J B Spitzer; P Milner; C Flevaris-Phillips; F Richardson; J C Kirchner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Speaking fundamental frequency of postlingually profoundly deaf adult men.

Authors:  S B Leder; J B Spitzer; J C Kirchner
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1987 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.547

4.  Total deafness: the need and possibility for a working definition.

Authors:  M C Martin
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1986-02

5.  An overview of the electronic cochlear prosthesis: clinical and research considerations.

Authors:  T J Balkany
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 3.346

6.  The effects of cochlear implant use on voice parameters.

Authors:  K I Kirk; B J Edgerton
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 3.346

7.  Psychoelectric measurements and results from cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  L F Helmerich; B J Edgerton
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1982 Mar-Apr

8.  Articulatory patterns of an adventitiously deaf speaker: implications for the role of auditory information in speech production.

Authors:  G Zimmermann; P Rettaliata
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1981-06

9.  Auditory assessment strategy and materials for adult and child candidates for cochlear implantation.

Authors:  B J Edgerton; L S Eisenberg; M A Thielemeir
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  Speaking rate of adventitiously deaf male cochlear implant candidates.

Authors:  S B Leder; J B Spitzer; J C Kirchner; C Flevaris-Phillips; P Milner; F Richardson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  2 in total

1.  The effect of cochlear implantation and post-operative rehabilitation on acoustic voice analysis in post-lingual hearing impaired adults.

Authors:  Sabah M Hassan; Khalid H Malki; Tamer A Mesallam; Mohamad Farahat; Manal Bukhari; Thomas Murry
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Real-time feedback control of voice in cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Anirudh Gautam; Jason A Brant; Michael J Ruckenstein; Steven J Eliades
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-11-21
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.