Nicole E Tomassi1,2, Hasini R Weerathunge2,3, Megan R Cushman2, Jason W Bohland4, Cara E Stepp1,2,3,5. 1. Graduate Program for Neuroscience, Boston University, MA. 2. Department of Speech, Language & Hearing Sciences, Boston University, MA. 3. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, MA. 4. Department of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, PA. 5. Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, MA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Auditory feedback is thought to contribute to the online control of speech production. Yet, the standard method of estimating auditory feedback control (i.e., reflexive responses to auditory-motor perturbations), although sound, requires specialized instrumentation, meticulous calibration, unnatural tasks, and specific acoustic environments. The purpose of this study was to explore more ecologically valid features of speech production to determine their relationships with auditory feedback mechanisms. METHOD: Two previously proposed measures of within-utterance variability (centering and baseline variability) were compared with reflexive response magnitudes in 30 adults with typical speech. These three measures were estimated for both the laryngeal and articulatory subsystems of speech. RESULTS: Regardless of the speech subsystem, neither centering nor baseline variability was shown to be related to reflexive response magnitudes. Likewise, no relationships were found between centering and baseline variability. CONCLUSIONS: Despite previous suggestions that centering and baseline variability may be related to auditory feedback mechanisms, this study did not support these assertions. However, the detection of such relationships may have required a larger degree of variability in responses, relative to that found in those with typical speech. Future research on these relationships is warranted in populations with more heterogeneous responses, such as children or clinical populations. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.17330546.
PURPOSE: Auditory feedback is thought to contribute to the online control of speech production. Yet, the standard method of estimating auditory feedback control (i.e., reflexive responses to auditory-motor perturbations), although sound, requires specialized instrumentation, meticulous calibration, unnatural tasks, and specific acoustic environments. The purpose of this study was to explore more ecologically valid features of speech production to determine their relationships with auditory feedback mechanisms. METHOD: Two previously proposed measures of within-utterance variability (centering and baseline variability) were compared with reflexive response magnitudes in 30 adults with typical speech. These three measures were estimated for both the laryngeal and articulatory subsystems of speech. RESULTS: Regardless of the speech subsystem, neither centering nor baseline variability was shown to be related to reflexive response magnitudes. Likewise, no relationships were found between centering and baseline variability. CONCLUSIONS: Despite previous suggestions that centering and baseline variability may be related to auditory feedback mechanisms, this study did not support these assertions. However, the detection of such relationships may have required a larger degree of variability in responses, relative to that found in those with typical speech. Future research on these relationships is warranted in populations with more heterogeneous responses, such as children or clinical populations. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.17330546.
Authors: Joseph S Perkell; Harlan Lane; Margaret Denny; Melanie L Matthies; Mark Tiede; Majid Zandipour; Jennell Vick; Ellen Burton Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 1.840