Literature DB >> 3390077

Evaluation of decisions regarding candidates for cochlear implants.

J B Spitzer1.   

Abstract

Stepwise regression analysis was used to evaluate measures predictive of the selection of candidates for cochlear implants. Results of a comprehensive selection protocol were compiled for a group of 31 profoundly hearing-impaired adults undergoing intensive pre-selection evaluation. Data included: unaided audiologic; aided audiologic; vestibular; otologic; medical; radiologic; voice/speech; speechreading; psychoacoustic; and electrophysiologic parameters. The results of the Cochlear Implant Team's decisions concerning selections of patients for implants were compared with the predictive outcome of regression analysis. Ramifications for the construction of cochlear implant evaluation protocols are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3390077     DOI: 10.1007/bf00481443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0302-9530


  8 in total

1.  Performance inventory for profound and severe loss (PIPSL).

Authors:  E Owens; M Raggio
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1988-02

2.  Audiologic evaluation of deaf children.

Authors:  N P Erber; C M Alencewicz
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1976-05

3.  Reacquisition of contrastive stress in an adventitiously deaf speaker using a single-channel cochlear implant.

Authors:  S B Leder; J B Spitzer; P Milner; C Flevaris-Phillips; F Richardson; J C Kirchner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Voice intensity of prospective cochlear implant candidates and normal hearing adult males.

Authors:  S B Leder; J B Spitzer; P Milner; C Flevaris-Phillips; J C Kirchner; F Richardson
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Standardization of four videotaped tests of speechreading ranging in task difficulty.

Authors:  J B Spitzer; S B Leder; P Milner; C Flevaris-Phillips; T G Giolas
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Speaking fundamental frequency of postlingually profoundly deaf adult men.

Authors:  S B Leder; J B Spitzer; J C Kirchner
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1987 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.547

7.  Diagnostic evaluation of the patient presenting with vertigo.

Authors:  S N Busis
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  1973-02       Impact factor: 3.346

8.  Hearing performance inventory.

Authors:  T G Giolas; E Owens; S H Lamb; E D Schubert
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1979-05
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.