Literature DB >> 3743918

The National Acoustic Laboratories' (NAL) new procedure for selecting the gain and frequency response of a hearing aid.

D Byrne, H Dillon.   

Abstract

A new procedure is presented for selecting the gain and frequency response of a hearing aid from pure-tone thresholds. This was developed from research which showed that a previous procedure did not meet its aim of amplifying all frequency bands of speech to equal loudness but that frequency responses which did so were considerably more effective. Measurements of 30 sensorineurally hearing-impaired ears (27 subjects), together with data from other studies, were analyzed to determine the best formula for predicting the optimal frequency response, for each individual, from the audiogram. The analysis indicated that a flat audiogram would require a rising frequency response characteristic of about 8 dB/octave up to 1.25 kHz and thereafter a falling characteristic of about 2 dB/octave. Variations in audiogram slope required about one-third as much variation in response slope. Three frequency average (3FA) gain was calculated to equal the 3FA gain of the previous procedure. Forty-four subjects (67 aided ears) fitted by the new procedure were evaluated by paired comparison judgments of the intelligibility and pleasantness of speech. The prescribed frequency response was seldom inferior to, and usually better than, any of several variations having more, or less, low and/or high-frequency amplification. On the average, used gain was approximately equal to prescribed gain. It is concluded that the new formula should prescribe a near optimal frequency response with few exceptions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3743918     DOI: 10.1097/00003446-198608000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  108 in total

1.  A self-fitting hearing aid: need and concept.

Authors:  Elizabeth Convery; Gitte Keidser; Harvey Dillon; Lisa Hartley
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2011-12-04

Review 2.  Use of hearing aids in infancy.

Authors:  S Wood; B McCormick
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Comparing the information conveyed by envelope modulation for speech intelligibility, speech quality, and music quality.

Authors:  James M Kates; Kathryn H Arehart
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The WHO-DAS II: measuring outcomes of hearing aid intervention for adults.

Authors:  Rachel McArdle; Theresa H Chisolm; Harvey B Abrams; Richard H Wilson; Patrick J Doyle
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2005

Review 5.  Adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO): a digital amplification strategy for hearing aids and cochlear implants.

Authors:  Peter J Blamey
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2005

6.  The neural representation of consonant-vowel transitions in adults who wear hearing AIDS.

Authors:  Kelly L Tremblay; Laura Kalstein; Cuttis J Billings; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-09

Review 7.  New perspectives on assessing amplification effects.

Authors:  Pamela E Souza; Kelly L Tremblay
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-09

8.  Using Objective Metrics to Measure Hearing Aid Performance.

Authors:  James M Kates; Kathryn H Arehart; Melinda C Anderson; Ramesh Kumar Muralimanohar; Lewis O Harvey
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Assessment of Hearing Aid Benefit Using Patient-Reported Outcomes and Audiologic Measures.

Authors:  James R Dornhoffer; Ted A Meyer; Judy R Dubno; Theodore R McRackan
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 1.854

Review 10.  Auditory reality and self-assessment of hearing.

Authors:  William Noble
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.