Literature DB >> 3734689

The width of the auditory filter in children.

R J Irwin, J A Stillman, A Schade.   

Abstract

Because young children have poorer auditory temporal resolution than older children, they ought to have, according to the inverse relation between temporal and frequency resolution, narrower auditory filters than older children. Therefore, the auditory filters of two 6-year-olds, two 10-year-olds, and two adults were measured by having them detect a 400-ms sinusoid (500, 1000, or 3000 Hz) centered in a spectral notch in a band of noise. The signal power for 71% correct was determined as a function of notch width with the two-alternative, forced-choice procedure. The principal results showed a significant decrease in signal power with age and a significant interaction between age and notch width. The best-fitting parameters of a model of the auditory filter showed that the filter was significantly wider for the 6-year-olds than for the 10-year-olds or the adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3734689     DOI: 10.1016/0022-0965(86)90003-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol        ISSN: 0022-0965


  10 in total

Review 1.  Rodent auditory perception: Critical band limitations and plasticity.

Authors:  J King; M Insanally; M Jin; A R O Martins; J A D'amour; R C Froemke
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  Age differences in discrimination of simulated single-formant frequency transitions.

Authors:  L L Elliott; M A Hammer; M E Scholl; J M Wasowicz
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-08

3.  A comparison of three adaptive psychophysical procedures using inexperienced listeners.

Authors:  J A Stillman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-10

4.  Sensitivity of school-aged children to pitch-related cues.

Authors:  Mickael L D Deroche; Danielle J Zion; Jaclyn R Schurman; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Frequency and electrode discrimination in children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Jonathan C Kopelovich; Marc D Eisen; Kevin H Franck
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 6.  Spectral Resolution Development in Children With Normal Hearing and With Cochlear Implants: A Review of Behavioral Studies.

Authors:  Kelly N Jahn; Julie G Arenberg; David L Horn
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 2.674

7.  The Effect of Remote Masking on the Reception of Speech by Young School-Age Children.

Authors:  Carla L Youngdahl; Eric W Healy; Sarah E Yoho; Frédéric Apoux; Rachael Frush Holt
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Children With Normal Hearing Are Efficient Users of Fundamental Frequency and Vocal Tract Length Cues for Voice Discrimination.

Authors:  Yael Zaltz; Raymond L Goldsworthy; Laurie S Eisenberg; Liat Kishon-Rabin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.562

9.  Development of auditory selective attention: why children struggle to hear in noisy environments.

Authors:  Pete R Jones; David R Moore; Sygal Amitay
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2015-03

10.  The Relationship Between Spectral Modulation Detection and Speech Recognition: Adult Versus Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Jack H Noble; Stephen M Camarata; Linsey W Sunderhaus; Robert T Dwyer; Benoit M Dawant; Mary S Dietrich; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.