Literature DB >> 20553829

Frequency and electrode discrimination in children with cochlear implants.

Jonathan C Kopelovich1, Marc D Eisen, Kevin H Franck.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to develop reliable pediatric psychophysical methodologies in order to address the limits of frequency and electrode discrimination in children with cochlear implants. Discrimination was measured with a two-alternative, adaptive, forced choice design using a video game graphical user interface. Implanted children were compared to normal-hearing children in the same age ranges. Twenty-nine implanted children and 68 children with normal-hearing performed frequency discrimination studies at varying frequencies. Electrode discrimination was assessed in thirty-four implanted children at varying electrode locations and stimulation intensities. Older children had better frequency discrimination than younger children, both for implanted and hearing subjects. Implanted children had worse frequency discrimination overall and exhibited learning effects at older ages than hearing children. Frequency discrimination Weber fractions were smallest in low frequencies. Electrode discrimination improved with stimulus intensity level for older but not younger children at all electrode locations. These results support the premise that developmental changes in signal processing contribute to discrimination of simple acoustic stimuli. For implanted children, auditory discrimination improved at lower frequencies and with electrodes at higher intensity. These findings imply that spatial separation may not be the key determinant in creating discriminable electrical stimuli for this population. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20553829      PMCID: PMC3670150          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  25 in total

1.  Electrode discrimination by early-deafened subjects using the cochlear limited multiple-electrode cochlear implant.

Authors:  P A Busby; G M Clark
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  [Tone recognition and electrode discrimination in prelingually deafened cochlear-implant listeners].

Authors:  Chao-gang Wei; Ke-li Cao; Xiao-wei Chen; Xin Jin; Zhen-yu Zheng; Fan-gang Zeng
Journal:  Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2004-02

3.  Frequency resolution in children.

Authors:  P Allen; F Wightman; D Kistler; T Dolan
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1989-06

4.  The width of the auditory filter in children.

Authors:  R J Irwin; J A Stillman; A Schade
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1986-06

5.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Frequency discrimination as a function of frequency and sensation level.

Authors:  C C Wier; W Jesteadt; D M Green
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Age-related improvements in auditory backward and simultaneous masking in 6- to 10-year-old children.

Authors:  D E Hartley; B A Wright; S C Hogan; D R Moore
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Electrode discrimination and speech perception in young children using cochlear implants.

Authors:  P W Dawson; C M McKay; P A Busby; D B Grayden; G M Clark
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Effects of Clarion electrode design on mapping levels in children.

Authors:  Kevin H Franck; Udayan K Shah; Roger R Marsh; William P Potsic
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.547

Review 10.  Use of auditory learning to manage listening problems in children.

Authors:  David R Moore; Lorna F Halliday; Sygal Amitay
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 6.237

View more
  4 in total

1.  Voice Discrimination by Adults with Cochlear Implants: the Benefits of Early Implantation for Vocal-Tract Length Perception.

Authors:  Yael Zaltz; Raymond L Goldsworthy; Liat Kishon-Rabin; Laurie S Eisenberg
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-01-08

2.  Deficits in the pitch sensitivity of cochlear-implanted children speaking English or Mandarin.

Authors:  Mickael L D Deroche; Hui-Ping Lu; Charles J Limb; Yung-Song Lin; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 4.677

3.  Deficits in the Sensitivity to Pitch Sweeps by School-Aged Children Wearing Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Mickael L D Deroche; Aditya M Kulkarni; Julie A Christensen; Charles J Limb; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Correlation between Auditory Spectral Resolution and Speech Perception in Children with Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Zahra Jeddi; Younes Lotfi; Abdollah Moossavi; Enayatollah Bakhshi; Seyed Basir Hashemi
Journal:  Iran J Med Sci       Date:  2019-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.