Literature DB >> 2762106

Age differences in discrimination of simulated single-formant frequency transitions.

L L Elliott, M A Hammer, M E Scholl, J M Wasowicz.   

Abstract

We studied auditory discrimination of simulated single-formant frequency transitions that resembled portions of certain speech consonants. Significant age differences in transition discrimination occurred; both children and older adults required larger acoustic differences between transitions for discrimination than did teenagers/young adults. Longer transitions were more easily discriminated than shorter transitions by all listeners, and there were no differences between discriminations of rising and falling transitions. Teens/young adults and older adults, but not children, required larger frequency differences to discriminate frequency transitions followed by a steady-state sound than for transitions alone. There were also age differences in discrimination of steady-state sounds. These developmental-perceptual differences may help explain why children and older adults who have good pure-tone sensitivity may experience difficulty in understanding speech.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2762106     DOI: 10.3758/bf03204981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  22 in total

1.  [Relation of the magnitude of masking of short tonal signals to a time interval between masked and masking sounds].

Authors:  I K SAMOILOVA
Journal:  Biofizika       Date:  1959

2.  Recognition of natural and time/intensity altered CVs by young and elderly subjects with normal hearing.

Authors:  S Gordon-Salant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Discrimination and response bias for CV syllables differing in voice onset time among children and adults.

Authors:  L L Elliott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Perception of gated, highly familiar spoken monosyllabic nouns by children, teenagers, and older adults.

Authors:  L L Elliott; M A Hammer; K E Evan
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-08

5.  Speech perception in infants.

Authors:  P D Eimas; E R Siqueland; P Jusczyk; J Vigorito
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-01-22       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Speech understanding and aging. Working Group on Speech Understanding and Aging. Committee on Hearing, Bioacoustics, and Biomechanics, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Identification and discrimination of consonant-vowel syllables by younger and older adults.

Authors:  L L Elliott; L A Busse; L L Bailet
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1985-04

8.  Developmental differences in identifying and discriminating CV syllables.

Authors:  L L Elliott; C Longinotti; D Meyer; I Raz; K Zucker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Children's understanding of monosyllabic nouns in quiet and in noise.

Authors:  L L Elliott; S Connors; E Kille; S Levin; K Ball; D Katz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Speech perception in early infancy: perceptual constancy for spectrally dissimilar vowel categories.

Authors:  P K Kuhl
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  7 in total

1.  Vowel identification by younger and older listeners: relative effectiveness of vowel edges and vowel centers.

Authors:  Gail S Donaldson; Elizabeth K Talmage; Catherine L Rogers
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Toddlers' recognition of noise-vocoded speech.

Authors:  Rochelle Newman; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Frequency and electrode discrimination in children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Jonathan C Kopelovich; Marc D Eisen; Kevin H Franck
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Developmental plasticity in the human auditory brainstem.

Authors:  Krista L Johnson; Trent Nicol; Steven G Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Effects of age and hearing loss on the relationship between discrimination of stochastic frequency modulation and speech perception.

Authors:  Stanley Sheft; Valeriy Shafiro; Christian Lorenzi; Rachel McMullen; Caitlin Farrell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Spatial modeling of prostate cancer metabolic gene expression reveals extensive heterogeneity and selective vulnerabilities.

Authors:  Yuliang Wang; Shuyi Ma; Walter L Ruzzo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Decreased ability in the segregation of dynamically changing vowel-analog streams: a factor in the age-related cocktail-party deficit?

Authors:  Pierre Divenyi
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 4.677

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.