Literature DB >> 3724571

Learning styles and approaches: implications for medical education.

D I Newble, N J Entwistle.   

Abstract

This paper reviews the recent literature on learning styles and approaches to learning. It identifies two separate streams of research, one originating from mainstream cognitive and psychometric psychology and one from research undertaken within the everyday learning environment. The latter is dealt with in greater detail as it seems to have more immediate practical relevance. A simple model of the teaching-learning process is presented showing how students learn in different ways which are partly attributable to their preferred learning style and partly to the context in which the learning takes place. Three basic approaches have been identified: surface, deep and strategic, each resulting in a different learning outcome. The most desirable and successful is the deep approach. The way in which the teaching and the policies of the department and school influence the students' approach to learning are reviewed in some detail. A consideration of these characteristics in medical schools suggested that many may hinder rather than assist in the development of the desired approach. The work reviewed here suggests that the remedy will require not only substantial changes in the teaching, curriculum and, particularly, assessment, but also a new strategy based on identifying and assisting individual students whose approaches to study are not those expected of a competent university-educated doctor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3724571     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1986.tb01163.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  59 in total

1.  Intercalated degrees, learning styles, and career preferences: prospective longitudinal study of UK medical students.

Authors:  I C McManus; P Richards; B C Winder
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-08-28

Review 2.  Factors associated with success in medical school: systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Eamonn Ferguson; David James; Laura Madeley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-04-20

Review 3.  How should we be teaching our undergraduates?

Authors:  J E Dacre; R A Fox
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  Medical students' compliance with simple administrative tasks and success in final examinations: retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Neil Wright; M S Tanner
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-06-29

5.  All that is solid melts into air--the implications of community based undergraduate medical education.

Authors:  S Iliffe
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Student selection.

Authors:  S Lowry
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-11-28

7.  Demise of the essay question.

Authors:  P Tombleson
Journal:  Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1990-11

8.  Current and future concerns.

Authors:  P Tombleson
Journal:  Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1990-11

9.  Students validate problem based learning.

Authors:  J Burke; R G Matthew; M Field; D Lloyd
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-02-11

10.  The association between reading time and students' performance in a surgery clerkship.

Authors:  A V Blue; M B Donnelly; T D Stratton; R W Schwartz; D A Sloan
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.