Literature DB >> 3721800

Amplitude of accommodation and refractive error.

N A McBrien, M Millodot.   

Abstract

This paper investigates the amplitude of accommodation of early onset myopes, late onset myopes, emmetropes, and hyperopes. Eighty subjects were used, 41 women and 39 men, with an age range of 18-22 yr (mean = 19.82). All subjects wore an optimum refractive correction, giving visual acuities of 20/20 or better. Significant differences were found between the four refractive groups, with late onset myopes having the largest amplitude of accommodation, followed by early onset myopes, emmetropes, and hyperopes. The results are discussed in the light of previous findings on tonic accommodation and the accommodative response gradient and interpretated in the context of a dual innervation to the ciliary muscle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3721800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  20 in total

1.  Steady-state accommodation and ocular biometry in late-onset myopia.

Authors:  M A Bullimore; B Gilmartin; J M Royston
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Characteristics of accommodative behavior during sustained reading in emmetropes and myopes.

Authors:  Elise Harb; Frank Thorn; David Troilo
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Minus-lens-stimulated accommodative amplitude decreases sigmoidally with age: a study of objectively measured accommodative amplitudes from age 3.

Authors:  Heather A Anderson; Gloria Hentz; Adrian Glasser; Karla K Stuebing; Ruth E Manny
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 4.  Clinical and laboratory investigations of the relationship of accommodation and convergence function with refractive error. A literature review.

Authors:  D A Goss; H Zhai
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Contact lenses vs spectacles in myopes: is there any difference in accommodative and binocular function?

Authors:  Raimundo Jiménez; Loreto Martínez-Almeida; Carlos Salas; Carolina Ortíz
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Subjective versus objective accommodative amplitude: preschool to presbyopia.

Authors:  Heather A Anderson; Karla K Stuebing
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Opposing effects of atropine and timolol on the color and luminance emmetropization mechanisms in chicks.

Authors:  Laura A Goldberg; Frances J Rucker
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Inter-individual variability in the dynamics of natural accommodation in humans: relation to age and refractive errors.

Authors:  F Schaeffel; H Wilhelm; E Zrenner
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Morphometric assessment of normal human ciliary body using ultrasound biomicroscopy.

Authors:  Yoshifumi Okamoto; Fumiki Okamoto; Shinichiro Nakano; Tetsuro Oshika
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Effect of Vision Therapy on Accommodation in Myopic Chinese Children.

Authors:  Martin Ming-Leung Ma; Mitchell Scheiman; Cuiyun Su; Xiang Chen
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 1.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.