Literature DB >> 3700255

The frequency-following response to continuous tones in humans.

R Batra, S Kuwada, V L Maher.   

Abstract

Previous studies of the frequency-following response (FFR) in man suggest that it has multiple sources. Identification of these sources has been complicated by the use of tone bursts to evoke FFRs and the lack of precise methods to calculate their amplitude and latency. Tone bursts produce transient responses which confound measurements of the FFR. The use of continuous tones avoids this problem and the Fast Fourier Transform can be used to assess accurately and efficiently the presence, amplitude and phase angle of the FFR. In this study we systematically examined the frequency and intensity range over which FFRs to continuous tones could be evoked using FFRs to tone bursts for comparison. We then analyzed FFRs to continuous tones to determine the sources of this potential. FFRs to both stimuli have similar thresholds (65-90 dB SPL) and can be evoked by the same range of frequencies. Neurogenic FFRs in man occur only below 1000 Hz. The source for this potential has a latency of 8.2 +/- 0.1 ms (mean +/- SD) and is consistent with a midbrain source. At higher frequencies FFRs have a latency of less than 1 ms and are most likely cochlear microphonic. The small variation in the latency of the neurogenic FFR suggests this as a possible tool for assessing neurological disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3700255     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(86)90037-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  13 in total

1.  Functional Interplay Between the Putative Measures of Rostral and Caudal Efferent Regulation of Speech Perception in Noise.

Authors:  Sandeep Maruthy; U Ajith Kumar; G Nike Gnanateja
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-04-26

2.  Neural Correlates of the Binaural Masking Level Difference in Human Frequency-Following Responses.

Authors:  Christopher G Clinard; Sarah L Hodgson; Mary Ellen Scherer
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-11-28

3.  Frequency following responses to tone glides: Effects of frequency extent, direction, and electrode montage.

Authors:  Curtis J Billings; William J Bologna; Ramesh Kumar Muralimanohar; Brandon M Madsen; Michelle R Molis
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Sex differences in auditory subcortical function.

Authors:  Jennifer Krizman; Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Aging alters the perception and physiological representation of frequency: evidence from human frequency-following response recordings.

Authors:  Christopher G Clinard; Kelly L Tremblay; Ananthanarayan R Krishnan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Efferent modulation of pre-neural and neural distortion products.

Authors:  S B Smith; K Ichiba; D S Velenovsky; B Cone
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Differential Group Delay of the Frequency Following Response Measured Vertically and Horizontally.

Authors:  Andrew King; Kathryn Hopkins; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-26

8.  Effects of Stimulus Intensity on Low-Frequency Toneburst Cochlear Microphonic Waveforms.

Authors:  Ming Zhang
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2013-02-21

9.  Electrically-evoked frequency-following response (EFFR) in the auditory brainstem of guinea pigs.

Authors:  Wenxin He; Xiuyong Ding; Ruxiang Zhang; Jing Chen; Daoxing Zhang; Xihong Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Subcortical neural synchrony and absolute thresholds predict frequency discrimination independently.

Authors:  F Marmel; D Linley; R P Carlyon; H E Gockel; K Hopkins; C J Plack
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-06-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.