Literature DB >> 3698594

The ability of women to recall their oral contraceptive histories.

A Coulter, M Vessey, K McPherson, B Crossley.   

Abstract

Self-reported contraceptive histories were obtained at interview from 99 women and compared with prospectively collected data from the Oxford-Family Planning Association cohort study. The effect of different memory aids was evaluated and an assessment was made of the completeness and accuracy of contraceptive histories recorded in general practice notes. Accuracy of recall of total duration of use was sufficiently good to establish the presence or otherwise of a duration-response relationship and could be improved by the use of a contraceptive calendar. Recall of specific brands used was less accurate. In studies where accurate information on use of particular preparations is required, the use of a photo album is recommended, supplemented by data obtained from general practice records to improve the accuracy of dates. General practice records on their own are not sufficiently complete to be used as a sole source of exposure data in studies in which it is important to obtain a complete oral contraceptive history.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Behavior; Contraception; Contraceptive Agents; Contraceptive Agents, Female; Contraceptive History; Contraceptive Methods; Contraceptive Usage; Data Analysis; Data Collection; Demographic Factors; Developed Countries; England; Error Sources; Europe; Family Planning; Fertility; Iec; Information; Information Processing; Measurement; Northern Europe; Oral Contraceptives; Organization And Administration; Population; Population Dynamics; Program Activities; Programs; Records; Reliability; Reproductive Behavior; Research Methodology; Sampling Studies; Scotland; Studies; Surveys; United Kingdom

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3698594     DOI: 10.1016/0010-7824(86)90079-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  23 in total

1.  Oral contraceptive formulation and risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Polly A Marchbanks; Kathryn M Curtis; Michele G Mandel; Hoyt G Wilson; Gary Jeng; Suzanne G Folger; Jill A McDonald; Janet R Daling; Leslie Bernstein; Kathleen E Malone; Phyllis A Wingo; Michael S Simon; Sandra A Norman; Brian L Strom; Giske Ursin; Linda K Weiss; Ronald T Burkman; Robert Spirtas
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  The association between discontinuing hormonal contraceptives and wives' marital satisfaction depends on husbands' facial attractiveness.

Authors:  V Michelle Russell; James K McNulty; Levi R Baker; Andrea L Meltzer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Oral contraceptives and breast cancer risk overall and by molecular subtype among young women.

Authors:  Elisabeth F Beaber; Kathleen E Malone; Mei-Tzu Chen Tang; William E Barlow; Peggy L Porter; Janet R Daling; Christopher I Li
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Oral contraceptive use as a determinant of plasma concentrations of perfluoroalkyl substances among women in the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort (MoBa) study.

Authors:  Elise L Rush; Alison B Singer; Matthew P Longnecker; Line S Haug; Azemira Sabaredzovic; Elaine Symanski; Kristina W Whitworth
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 9.621

Review 5.  Patient self-reports in pharmacoeconomic studies. Their use and impact on study validity.

Authors:  C Evans; B Crawford
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  A comparison of self-reported oral contraceptive use and automated pharmacy data in perimenopausal and early postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Leslie Spangler; Laura E Ichikawa; Rebecca A Hubbard; Belinda Operskalski; Andrea Z LaCroix; Susan M Ott; Delia Scholes
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.797

7.  Oral contraceptive use and bone density in adolescent and young adult women.

Authors:  Delia Scholes; Laura Ichikawa; Andrea Z LaCroix; Leslie Spangler; Jeannette M Beasley; Susan Reed; Susan M Ott
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.375

8.  Oral contraception and risk of a cerebral thromboembolic attack: results of a case-control study.

Authors:  O Lidegaard
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-04-10

9.  Comparison of prospective daily diaries and retrospective recall to measure oral contraceptive adherence.

Authors:  Larissa R Brunner Huber; Elizabeth C Broel; Ashley N Mitchelides; Jacek Dmochowski; Michael Dulin; Delia Scholes
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 3.375

10.  Recent oral contraceptive use by formulation and breast cancer risk among women 20 to 49 years of age.

Authors:  Elisabeth F Beaber; Diana S M Buist; William E Barlow; Kathleen E Malone; Susan D Reed; Christopher I Li
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 12.701

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.