Elise L Rush1, Alison B Singer2, Matthew P Longnecker3, Line S Haug4, Azemira Sabaredzovic4, Elaine Symanski5, Kristina W Whitworth6. 1. Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics and Environmental Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health in San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA. 2. The Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. 3. National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Durham, NC, USA. 4. Department of Exposure Assessment and Epidemiology, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway. 5. Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics and Environmental Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA; Southwest Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA. 6. Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics and Environmental Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health in San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA; Southwest Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA. Electronic address: Kristina.w.whitworth@uth.tmc.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Because oral contraceptives (OC) tends to lessen menstrual fluid loss - a route of excretion for perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) - we hypothesized that such use would be positively associated with PFAS concentrations. METHODS: This analysis was based on the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort (MoBa) study. We included 1090 women from two previous substudies of women enrolled from 2003 to 2007. Characteristics of OC use were obtained at baseline: use in the past 12months, duration and recency of use, age at first use. We examined log-transformed plasma concentrations of seven PFASs (perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA), perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA), perfluoroundecanoic acid (PFUnDA), perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHxS), perfluoroheptane sulfonate (PFHpS), and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS)). Linear regression analyses, adjusted for maternal age, menstrual cycle length, parity, and education, were used to examine whether OC use characteristics were determinants of PFAS concentrations. RESULTS: Except for PFDA and PFUnDA, women who used OCs in the 12months preceding the baseline interview had 12.9-35.7% higher PFAS concentrations than never OC users. To a lesser extent, past OC use was positively associated with PFASs (estimates ranged from 7.2-32.1%). Compared with never users, using OCs for 10 or more years was associated with increased PFAS concentrations, except for PFDA and PFUnDA (estimates for other PFASs ranged from 18.9-46.2%). We observed little effect of age at first OC use. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis shows that characteristics of OC use, and duration of use in particular, may be important considerations when investigating relationships between women's reproductive outcomes and PFASs.
OBJECTIVE: Because oral contraceptives (OC) tends to lessen menstrual fluid loss - a route of excretion for perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) - we hypothesized that such use would be positively associated with PFAS concentrations. METHODS: This analysis was based on the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort (MoBa) study. We included 1090 women from two previous substudies of women enrolled from 2003 to 2007. Characteristics of OC use were obtained at baseline: use in the past 12months, duration and recency of use, age at first use. We examined log-transformed plasma concentrations of seven PFASs (perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA), perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA), perfluoroundecanoic acid (PFUnDA), perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHxS), perfluoroheptane sulfonate (PFHpS), and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS)). Linear regression analyses, adjusted for maternal age, menstrual cycle length, parity, and education, were used to examine whether OC use characteristics were determinants of PFAS concentrations. RESULTS: Except for PFDA and PFUnDA, women who used OCs in the 12months preceding the baseline interview had 12.9-35.7% higher PFAS concentrations than never OC users. To a lesser extent, past OC use was positively associated with PFASs (estimates ranged from 7.2-32.1%). Compared with never users, using OCs for 10 or more years was associated with increased PFAS concentrations, except for PFDA and PFUnDA (estimates for other PFASs ranged from 18.9-46.2%). We observed little effect of age at first OC use. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis shows that characteristics of OC use, and duration of use in particular, may be important considerations when investigating relationships between women's reproductive outcomes and PFASs.
Authors: Gerard Ngueta; Matthew P Longnecker; Miyoung Yoon; Christopher D Ruark; Harvey J Clewell; Melvin E Andersen; Marc-André Verner Journal: Environ Int Date: 2017-04-06 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Scott M Bartell; Antonia M Calafat; Christopher Lyu; Kayoko Kato; P Barry Ryan; Kyle Steenland Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Kirsten J Lum; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Dana B Barr; Thomas A Louis; Germaine M Buck Louis Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Ying Li; Tony Fletcher; Daniel Mucs; Kristin Scott; Christian H Lindh; Pia Tallving; Kristina Jakobsson Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2017-11-13 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Lauren A Wise; Amelia K Wesselink; Samantha Schildroth; Antonia M Calafat; Traci N Bethea; Ruth J Geller; Chad M Coleman; Victoria Fruh; Birgit Claus Henn; Julianne C Botelho; Quaker E Harmon; Maya Thirkill; Ganesa R Wegienka; Donna D Baird Journal: Environ Res Date: 2021-08-14 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Samantha Schildroth; Lauren A Wise; Amelia K Wesselink; Payton De La Cruz; Traci N Bethea; Jennifer Weuve; Victoria Fruh; Julianne C Botelho; Andreas Sjodin; Antonia M Calafat; Donna D Baird; Birgit Claus Henn Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2021-09-30 Impact factor: 11.357
Authors: Judith M Graber; Cora Alexander; Robert J Laumbach; Kathleen Black; Pamela Ohman Strickland; Panos G Georgopoulos; Elizabeth G Marshall; Derek G Shendell; Donald Alderson; Zhongyuan Mi; Michael Mascari; Clifford P Weisel Journal: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Date: 2018-11-27 Impact factor: 5.563
Authors: Melvin E Andersen; Bruno Hagenbuch; Udayan Apte; J Christopher Corton; Tony Fletcher; Christopher Lau; William L Roth; Bart Staels; Gloria L Vega; Harvey J Clewell; Matthew P Longnecker Journal: Toxicology Date: 2021-07-08 Impact factor: 4.571