Literature DB >> 25404285

The association between discontinuing hormonal contraceptives and wives' marital satisfaction depends on husbands' facial attractiveness.

V Michelle Russell1, James K McNulty1, Levi R Baker2, Andrea L Meltzer3.   

Abstract

How are hormonal contraceptives (HCs) related to marital well-being? Some work suggests HCs suppress biological processes associated with women's preferences for partner qualities reflective of genetic fitness, qualities that may be summarized by facial attractiveness. Given that realizing such interpersonal preferences positively predicts relationship satisfaction, any changes in women's preferences associated with changes in their HC use may interact with partner facial attractiveness to predict women's relationship satisfaction. We tested this possibility using two longitudinal studies of 118 newlywed couples. Trained observers objectively rated husbands' facial attractiveness in both studies. In study 1, wives reported their marital satisfaction every 6 mo for 4 y and then reported the history of their HC use for their relationship. In study 2, wives reported whether they were using HCs when they met their husbands and then their marital satisfaction and HC use every 4 mo for up to three waves. In both studies, and in an analysis that combined the data from both studies, wives who were using HCs when they formed their relationship with their husband were less satisfied with their marriage when they discontinued HCs if their husband had a relatively less attractive face, but more satisfied if their husband had a relatively more attractive face. Beginning HCs demonstrated no consistent associations with marital satisfaction. Incongruency between HC use at relationship formation and current HC use was negatively associated with sexual satisfaction, regardless of husbands' facial attractiveness. These findings suggest that HC use may have unintended implications for women's close relationships.

Entities:  

Keywords:  evolutionary psychology; hormonal contraceptives; human mating; marriage; physical attractiveness

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25404285      PMCID: PMC4260593          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1414784111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  25 in total

1.  Ideals, perceptions, and evaluations in early relationship development.

Authors:  G J Fletcher; J A Simpson; G Thomas
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2000-12

2.  Major histocompatibility complex alleles, sexual responsivity, and unfaithfulness in romantic couples.

Authors:  Christine E Garver-Apgar; Steven W Gangestad; Randy Thornhill; Robert D Miller; Jon J Olp
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-10

Review 3.  The effects of hormonal contraceptives on female sexuality: a review.

Authors:  Lara J Burrows; Maureen Basha; Andrew T Goldstein
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 3.802

4.  Relationship satisfaction and outcome in women who meet their partner while using oral contraception.

Authors:  S Craig Roberts; Katerina Klapilová; Anthony C Little; Robert P Burriss; Benedict C Jones; Lisa M DeBruine; Marion Petrie; Jan Havlícek
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Women's estradiol predicts preference for facial cues of men's testosterone.

Authors:  James R Roney; Zachary L Simmons
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 3.587

6.  Trends in contraceptive use.

Authors:  Jacqueline E Darroch
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Preferences for masculinity in male bodies change across the menstrual cycle.

Authors:  Anthony C Little; Benedict C Jones; Robert P Burriss
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2007-03-24       Impact factor: 3.587

Review 8.  Does the contraceptive pill alter mate choice in humans?

Authors:  Alexandra Alvergne; Virpi Lummaa
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 17.712

9.  Changes in women's feelings about their romantic relationships across the ovulatory cycle.

Authors:  Christina M Larson; Martie G Haselton; Kelly A Gildersleeve; Elizabeth G Pillsworth
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 3.587

10.  MHC-correlated odour preferences in humans and the use of oral contraceptives.

Authors:  S Craig Roberts; L Morris Gosling; Vaughan Carter; Marion Petrie
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  2 in total

1.  Does support need to be seen? Daily invisible support promotes next day relationship well-being.

Authors:  Yuthika U Girme; Michael R Maniaci; Harry T Reis; James K McNulty; Cheryl L Carmichael; Shelly L Gable; Levi R Baker; Nickola C Overall
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2018-09-13

2.  Hormonal contraceptives suppress oxytocin-induced brain reward responses to the partner's face.

Authors:  Dirk Scheele; Jessica Plota; Birgit Stoffel-Wagner; Wolfgang Maier; René Hurlemann
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 3.436

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.