Literature DB >> 25453353

A comparison of self-reported oral contraceptive use and automated pharmacy data in perimenopausal and early postmenopausal women.

Leslie Spangler1, Laura E Ichikawa2, Rebecca A Hubbard2, Belinda Operskalski2, Andrea Z LaCroix3, Susan M Ott4, Delia Scholes2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Oral contraceptive (OC) use can occur throughout a woman's reproductive life span with the potential for long-term impacts on health. To assess potential measurement error in prior OC use, this study compared level of agreement between self-reported prior OC use and pharmacy dispensing data in perimenopausal and/or early postmenopausal women.
METHODS: The study's 1399 women (ages, 45-59 years) were participants in a population-based case-control study of the association between OC use and fracture risk. Episodes of lifetime self-reported OC use (in months) were collected, by telephone interview, for January 1, 2008 through November 25, 2012. Pharmacy fills, back to 1980, were collected from automated data. Agreement was measured using the prevalence-adjusted and bias-adjusted kappa index.
RESULTS: The number of women with OC pharmacy fills was 11% to 45% higher than those who reported OC use during each time period. Between-measures agreement was better for more recent use. Prevalence-adjusted and bias-adjusted kappa index values ranged from 0.88 (95% confidence interval, 0.85-0.90) within 5 years from the reference date to 0.65 (95% confidence interval, 0.59-0.71) within 15 to 20 years.
CONCLUSIONS: For studies designed to assess the long-term effects of OC use, the current results are reassuring in noting moderate agreement between self-reported OC use and pharmacy data for up to 15 to 20 years before the interview.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agreement; Contraceptives, oral; Kappa; Reproducibility of results

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25453353      PMCID: PMC4300298          DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2014.10.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Epidemiol        ISSN: 1047-2797            Impact factor:   3.797


  23 in total

1.  Measuring agreement between two judges on the presence or absence of a trait.

Authors:  J L Fleiss
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Pharmacy data in epidemiological studies: an easy to obtain and reliable tool.

Authors:  Taco B M Monster; Wilbert M T Janssen; Paul E de Jong; Lolkje T W de Jong-van den Berg
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.890

Review 3.  Development and use of reporting guidelines for assessing the quality of validation studies of health administrative data.

Authors:  Eric I Benchimol; Douglas G Manuel; Teresa To; Anne M Griffiths; Linda Rabeneck; Astrid Guttmann
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Types of combined oral contraceptives used by US women.

Authors:  Kelli Stidham Hall; James Trussell
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  The ability of women to recall their oral contraceptive histories.

Authors:  A Coulter; M Vessey; K McPherson; B Crossley
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Accuracy of recall of histories of oral contraceptive use.

Authors:  R Glass; B Johnson; M Vessey
Journal:  Br J Prev Soc Med       Date:  1974-11

7.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Agreement rates between oral contraceptive users and prescribers in relation to drug use histories.

Authors:  P D Stolley; J A Tonascia; P E Sartwell; M S Tockman; S Tonascia; A Rutledge; R Schinnar
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Reliability of Group Health Cooperative automated pharmacy data by drug benefit status.

Authors:  Denise M Boudreau; Mark P Doescher; Barry G Saver; J Elizabeth Jackson; Paul A Fishman
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.890

10.  A case-control study of the possible association between oral contraceptives and malignant melanoma.

Authors:  S A Adam; J K Sheaves; N H Wright; G Mosser; R W Harris; M P Vessey
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  3 in total

1.  Oral contraceptive use and fracture risk around the menopausal transition.

Authors:  Delia Scholes; Andrea Z LaCroix; Rebecca A Hubbard; Laura E Ichikawa; Leslie Spangler; Belinda H Operskalski; Nancy Gell; Susan M Ott
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Duration, recency, and type of hormonal contraceptive use and antimüllerian hormone levels.

Authors:  Lia A Bernardi; Marissa Steinberg Weiss; Anne Waldo; Quaker Harmon; Mercedes R Carnethon; Donna D Baird; Lauren A Wise; Erica E Marsh
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 7.490

3.  Misreporting of contraceptive hormone use in clinical research participants.

Authors:  Sharon L Achilles; Felix G Mhlanga; Petina Musara; Samuel M Poloyac; Zvavahera M Chirenje; Sharon L Hillier
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 3.375

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.