Literature DB >> 3676151

Contrast sensitivity, acuity, and the perception of 'real-world' targets.

C Owsley1, M E Sloane.   

Abstract

A major assumption underlying the use of contrast sensitivity testing is that it predicts whether a patient has difficulty seeing objects encountered in everyday life. However, there has been no large-scale attempt to examine whether this putative relationship actually exists. We have examined this assumption using a clinic based sample of adults aged 20-77 years. Contrast thresholds were measured for both: (1) gratings of 0.5-22.8 cycles/degree; and (2) real-world targets (faces, road signs, objects). Multiple regression techniques indicated that the best predictors of thresholds for real-world targets were age and middle to low spatial frequencies. Models incorporating these variables accounted for 25-40% of the variance. Although acuity significantly correlated with thresholds for real-world targets, the inclusion of acuity as a predictor variable did not improve the model. These data provide direct evidence that spatial contrast sensitivity can effectively predict how well patients see targets typical of everyday life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3676151      PMCID: PMC1041308          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.71.10.791

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  12 in total

1.  Impairment of contrast sensitivity function (CSF) as a measure of disability glare.

Authors:  M Abrahamsson; J Sjöstrand
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 2.  The importance of measuring contrast sensitivity in cases of visual disturbance.

Authors:  G B Arden
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Age variations in normal human contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  G Derefeldt; G Lennerstrand; B Lundh
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1979-08

4.  Contrast sensitivity throughout adulthood.

Authors:  C Owsley; R Sekuler; D Siemsen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Large-sample norms for contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  A P Ginsburg; D W Evans; M W Cannon; C Owsley; P Mulvanny
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1984-02

6.  The role of high spatial frequencies in face perception.

Authors:  A Fiorentini; L Maffei; G Sandini
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Contrast sensitivity predicts age-related differences in highway-sign discriminability.

Authors:  D W Evans; A P Ginsburg
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 2.888

8.  Age, the eye, and the visual channels: contrast sensitivity and response speed.

Authors:  D W Kline; F Schieber; L C Abusamra; A C Coyne
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1983-03

9.  Contrast sensitivity predicts pilots' performance in aircraft simulators.

Authors:  A P Ginsburg; D W Evans; R Sekule; S A Harp
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1982-01

10.  Aging and low-contrast vision: face perception.

Authors:  C Owsley; R Sekuler; C Boldt
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  77 in total

Review 1.  Neurovisual rehabilitation: recent developments and future directions.

Authors:  G Kerkhoff
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Myopia in Singapore: taking a public health approach.

Authors:  B Seet; T Y Wong; D T Tan; S M Saw; V Balakrishnan; L K Lee; A S Lim
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Face recognition in age related macular degeneration: perceived disability, measured disability, and performance with a bioptic device.

Authors:  L Tejeria; R A Harper; P H Artes; C M Dickinson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Retinal function in patients with serpiginous choroiditis: a microperimetry study.

Authors:  Elisabetta Pilotto; Stela Vujosevic; Vuga Ana Grgic; Patrik Sportiello; Enrica Convento; Antonio Giovanni Secchi; Edoardo Midena
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Bingo! Externally supported performance intervention for deficient visual search in normal aging, Parkinson's disease, and Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Thomas M Laudate; Sandy Neargarder; Tracy E Dunne; Karen D Sullivan; Pallavi Joshi; Grover C Gilmore; Tatiana M Riedel; Alice Cronin-Golomb
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2011-11-09

6.  Diffusion tensor imaging of the optic tracts in multiple sclerosis: association with retinal thinning and visual disability.

Authors:  Hormuzdiyar H Dasenbrock; Seth A Smith; Arzu Ozturk; Sheena K Farrell; Peter A Calabresi; Daniel S Reich
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.486

Review 7.  [Visually based reading disorders after brain damage. Standardised assessment and treatment with READ].

Authors:  G Kerkhoff; C Marquardt
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.214

8.  Vision-related quality of life and visual function following intravitreal bevacizumab injection for persistent diabetic macular edema after vitrectomy.

Authors:  Yoshifumi Okamoto; Fumiki Okamoto; Takahiro Hiraoka; Tetsuro Oshika
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 9.  The Assessment of Visual Function and Functional Vision.

Authors:  Christopher R Bennett; Peter J Bex; Corinna M Bauer; Lotfi B Merabet
Journal:  Semin Pediatr Neurol       Date:  2019-05-11       Impact factor: 1.636

10.  An instrument for assessment of subjective visual disability in cataract patients.

Authors:  K Pesudovs; D J Coster
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.638

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.