Literature DB >> 3721791

Impairment of contrast sensitivity function (CSF) as a measure of disability glare.

M Abrahamsson, J Sjöstrand.   

Abstract

A method for quantitative measurements of disability glare in clinical practice is presented. Glare is induced by a circular fluorescent tube which surrounds a sinusoidal grating displayed on a monitor. The threshold contrast that is needed for detection of the grating is measured with and without presence of the glare light. This is repeated for several different spatial frequencies. The discrepancy between the contrast sensitivity function (CSF) obtained with and without glare light was used to calculate the glare score (n) as a measure of disability glare. This was done for normals and cataract patients. The results show that an increasing glare score is related to an increase in turbidity of the optic media, while visual acuity had a weak correlation to the glare score. We also studied the relation glare score versus luminance and found that normals had a glare score that was almost independent of luminance level, while the cataract patients had a marked decrease in glare sensitivity when the luminance decreased. Most patients had a glare score that corresponded to their glare problems. These findings indicate a potential for using this psychophysical disability glare test method in industry, transport, and clinical ophthalmology. Some sources of methodological error inherent in the test method are evaluated and discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3721791

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  26 in total

Review 1.  Why HID headlights bother older drivers.

Authors:  M A Mainster; G T Timberlake
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Systems of analysis of posterior capsule opacification.

Authors:  T M Aslam; B Dhillon; N Werghi; A Taguri; A Wadood
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Bayesian adaptive estimation of the contrast sensitivity function: the quick CSF method.

Authors:  Luis Andres Lesmes; Zhong-Lin Lu; Jongsoo Baek; Thomas D Albright
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Meeting the UK driving vision standards with reduced contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  S Rae; K Latham; M F Katsou
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Rapid and reliable assessment of the contrast sensitivity function on an iPad.

Authors:  Michael Dorr; Luis A Lesmes; Zhong-Lin Lu; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 6.  Effect of corneal light scatter on vision: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Leopoldo Spadea; Giorgia Maraone; Francesca Verboschi; Enzo Maria Vingolo; Daniele Tognetto
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 1.779

7.  Induced intraocular light scatter and the sensitivity gradient of the normal visual field.

Authors:  J M Wood; J M Wild; S J Crews
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 8.  The Assessment of Visual Function and Functional Vision.

Authors:  Christopher R Bennett; Peter J Bex; Corinna M Bauer; Lotfi B Merabet
Journal:  Semin Pediatr Neurol       Date:  2019-05-11       Impact factor: 1.636

9.  Alterations in the shape of the automated perimetric profile arising from cataract.

Authors:  J M Wood; J M Wild; D L Smerdon; S J Crews
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Contrast sensitivity, acuity, and the perception of 'real-world' targets.

Authors:  C Owsley; M E Sloane
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 4.638

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.