BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Visual disability is common in multiple sclerosis, but its relationship to abnormalities of the optic tracts remains unknown. Because they are only rarely affected by lesions, the optic tracts may represent a good model for assessing the imaging properties of normal-appearing white matter in multiple sclerosis. METHODS: Whole-brain diffusion tensor imaging was performed on 34 individuals with multiple sclerosis and 26 healthy volunteers. The optic tracts were reconstructed by tractography, and tract-specific diffusion indices were quantified. In the multiple-sclerosis group, peripapillary retinal nerve-fiber-layer thickness and total macular volume were measured by optical coherence tomography, and visual acuity at 100%, 2.5%, and 1.25% contrast was examined. RESULTS: After adjusting for age and sex, optic-tract mean and perpendicular diffusivity were higher (P=.002) in multiple sclerosis. Lower optic-tract fractional anisotropy was correlated with retinal nerve-fiber-layer thinning (r=.51, P=.003) and total-macular-volume reduction (r=.59, P=.002). However, optic-tract diffusion indices were not specifically correlated with visual acuity or with their counterparts in the optic radiation. CONCLUSIONS: Optic-tract diffusion abnormalities are associated with retinal damage, suggesting that both may be related to optic-nerve injury, but do not appear to contribute strongly to visual disability in multiple sclerosis.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Visual disability is common in multiple sclerosis, but its relationship to abnormalities of the optic tracts remains unknown. Because they are only rarely affected by lesions, the optic tracts may represent a good model for assessing the imaging properties of normal-appearing white matter in multiple sclerosis. METHODS: Whole-brain diffusion tensor imaging was performed on 34 individuals with multiple sclerosis and 26 healthy volunteers. The optic tracts were reconstructed by tractography, and tract-specific diffusion indices were quantified. In the multiple-sclerosis group, peripapillary retinal nerve-fiber-layer thickness and total macular volume were measured by optical coherence tomography, and visual acuity at 100%, 2.5%, and 1.25% contrast was examined. RESULTS: After adjusting for age and sex, optic-tract mean and perpendicular diffusivity were higher (P=.002) in multiple sclerosis. Lower optic-tract fractional anisotropy was correlated with retinal nerve-fiber-layer thinning (r=.51, P=.003) and total-macular-volume reduction (r=.59, P=.002). However, optic-tract diffusion indices were not specifically correlated with visual acuity or with their counterparts in the optic radiation. CONCLUSIONS:Optic-tract diffusion abnormalities are associated with retinal damage, suggesting that both may be related to optic-nerve injury, but do not appear to contribute strongly to visual disability in multiple sclerosis.
Authors: Bennett A Landman; Jonathan A D Farrell; Craig K Jones; Seth A Smith; Jerry L Prince; Susumu Mori Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2007-04-04 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Daniel S Reich; Seth A Smith; Kathleen M Zackowski; Eliza M Gordon-Lipkin; Craig K Jones; Jonathan A D Farrell; Susumu Mori; Peter C M van Zijl; Peter A Calabresi Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2007-08-15 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: L J Balcer; S L Galetta; P A Calabresi; C Confavreux; G Giovannoni; E Havrdova; M Hutchinson; L Kappos; F D Lublin; D H Miller; P W O'Connor; J T Phillips; C H Polman; E-W Radue; R A Rudick; W H Stuart; A Wajgt; B Weinstock-Guttman; D R Wynn; F Lynn; M A Panzara Journal: Neurology Date: 2007-04-17 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: G F Wu; E D Schwartz; T Lei; A Souza; S Mishra; D A Jacobs; C E Markowitz; S L Galetta; M L Nano-Schiavi; L M Desiderio; G R Cutter; P A Calabresi; J K Udupa; L J Balcer Journal: Neurology Date: 2007-09-19 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: E Gordon-Lipkin; B Chodkowski; D S Reich; S A Smith; M Pulicken; L J Balcer; E M Frohman; G Cutter; P A Calabresi Journal: Neurology Date: 2007-10-16 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Andrew P D Henderson; S Anand Trip; Patricio G Schlottmann; Daniel R Altmann; David F Garway-Heath; Gordon T Plant; David H Miller Journal: Brain Date: 2007-12-04 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: S A Smith; Z R Williams; J N Ratchford; S D Newsome; S K Farrell; J A D Farrell; A Gifford; N R Miller; P C M van Zijl; P A Calabresi; D S Reich Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2011-07-28 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: David A Paul; Elon Gaffin-Cahn; Eric B Hintz; Giscard J Adeclat; Tong Zhu; Zoë R Williams; G Edward Vates; Bradford Z Mahon Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2014-12-10 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: John W Rutland; Francesco Padormo; Cindi K Yim; Amy Yao; Annie Arrighi-Allisan; Kuang-Han Huang; Hung-Mo Lin; James Chelnis; Bradley N Delman; Raj K Shrivastava; Priti Balchandani Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2019-01-18 Impact factor: 5.115