Literature DB >> 9797660

An instrument for assessment of subjective visual disability in cataract patients.

K Pesudovs1, D J Coster.   

Abstract

AIMS/
BACKGROUND: The construction and validation of an instrument for the assessment of subjective visual disability in the cataract patient is described. This instrument is specifically designed for measuring the outcome of cataract surgery with respect to visual disability.
METHODS: Visually related activities thought to be affected by cataract were considered for the questionnaire. These were reduced by pilot study and principal components analysis to 18 items. A patient's assessment of his/her ability to perform each task was scored on a four point scale. Scores were averaged to create an overall index of visual disability, as well as subscale indices for mobility related disability, distance/lighting/reading related disability, and near and related tasks visual disability. The questionnaire, administered verbally is entitled "The Visual Disability Assessment (VDA)". Reliability testing included test-retest reliability, interobserver reliability (p, the intraclass correlation coefficient), and internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha). Construct validation, the process for proving that a test measures what it is supposed to measure, included consideration of content validity, comparison with the established Activities of Daily Vision Scale (ADVS) and empirical support with factor analysis.
RESULTS: For the four indices, interobserver reliability varied from 0.92 to 0.94, test-retest reliability varied from 0.96 to 0.98, and internal consistency reliability varied from 0.80 to 0.93. The VDA compared favourably with the ADVS by correlation, but Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated that the two instruments were not clinically interchangeable. Factor analysis suggests that all test items measure a common theme, and the subgroupings reflect common themes.
CONCLUSIONS: The VDA is easy to administer because it has a short test time and scoring is straightforward. It has excellent interobserver, test-retest, and internal consistency reliability, and compares favourably with the ADVS, another test of visual disability. Factor analysis demonstrated that the 18 items measure a related theme, which can be assumed to be visual disability. The VDA is a valid instrument which provides a comprehensive assessment of visual disability in cataract patients and is designed to detect changes within a patient over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9797660      PMCID: PMC1722619          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.82.6.617

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  52 in total

1.  Suitability for day case cataract surgery.

Authors:  K J Lowe; D A Gregory; R I Jeffery; D L Easty
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Social and other aspects of adjustment to single eye cataract extraction in elderly patients.

Authors:  J F Hilbourne
Journal:  Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K       Date:  1975-07

3.  Vision through an abnormal cornea: a pilot study of the relationship between visual loss from corneal distortion, corneal edema, keratoconus, and some allied corneal pathology.

Authors:  R F Hess; L G Carney
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  The 22-item scale used in field studies of mental illness: a question of method, a question of substance, and a question of theory.

Authors:  L H Seiler
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1973-09

5.  Subtle disturbances of vision with compressive lesions of the anterior visual pathway measured by contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  M J Kupersmith; I M Siegel; R E Carr
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Visual functioning in cataract patients. Methods of measuring and results.

Authors:  P Bernth-Petersen
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1981-04

7.  Predicting the success of cataract surgery.

Authors:  S B Murphy; D C Donderi
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1980-03

8.  Vision through cataracts.

Authors:  R Hess; G Woo
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Visual factors and orientation-mobility performance.

Authors:  J A Marron; I L Bailey
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1982-05

10.  Arden grating test in evaluating "early" posterior subcapsular cataracts.

Authors:  H W Skalka
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 0.954

View more
  12 in total

1.  A qualitative investigation of visual tasks with which to assess distance-specific visual function.

Authors:  Mark J Atkinson; Steven Tally; Chris W Heichel; Igor Kozak; Jennifer Leich; Ashley Levack
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  An enhanced functional ability questionnaire (faVIQ) to measure the impact of rehabilitation services on the visually impaired.

Authors:  James Stuart Wolffsohn; Jonathan Jackson; Olivia Anne Hunt; Charles Cottriall; Jennifer Lindsay; Richard Gilmour; Anne Sinclair; Robert Harper
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Measuring visual symptoms in British cataract patients: the cataract symptom scale.

Authors:  H L Crabtree; A J Hildreth; J E O'Connell; P S Phelan; D Allen; C S Gray
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 4.  Vision-specific instruments for the assessment of health-related quality of life and visual functioning: a literature review.

Authors:  Mary Kay Margolis; Karin Coyne; Tessa Kennedy-Martin; Timothy Baker; Oliver Schein; Dennis A Revicki
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Quality of care from the perspective of the cataract patient: the reliability and validity of the QUOTE-cataract.

Authors:  M D Nijkamp; H J M Sixma; H Afman; F Hiddema; S A Koopmans; B van den Borne; F Hendrikse; R M M A Nuijts
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  [Quality of life - methodology and clinical practice aspects with a focus on ocular medicine].

Authors:  G H Franke; C Gall
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.059

7.  Quality of life in age-related macular degeneration: a review of available vision-specific psychometric tools.

Authors:  Robert P Finger; Monika Fleckenstein; Frank G Holz; Hendrik P N Scholl
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Evaluation of item candidates for a diabetic retinopathy quality of life item bank.

Authors:  Eva K Fenwick; Konrad Pesudovs; Jyoti Khadka; Gwyn Rees; Tien Y Wong; Ecosse L Lamoureux
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  The importance of rating scales in measuring patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  Jyoti Khadka; Vijaya K Gothwal; Colm McAlinden; Ecosse L Lamoureux; Konrad Pesudovs
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 10.  Cataract surgery and quality of life implications.

Authors:  Daniel Morris; Scott G Fraser; Christopher Gray
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.